10686 Players currently online!
Man vs. Machine - good luck!
Turn-based games at any time!
Vote for the best move to win!
Do you have what it takes?
Sharpen your tactical vision!
Get advice and game insights!
Learn from top players & pros!
View millions of master games!
Your virtual chess coach!
Perfect your opening moves!
Test your skills vs. computer!
Find the right private coach!
Can you solve it each day?
Bring it all together!
Beginners, start here!
Make friends & play team games!
News from the world of chess!
Search all Chess.com members!
Find local clubs & events!
Who's the best of your friends?
Read what members are saying!
My opening knowledge is bad but I'm a decent player I guess (1575 on RedHotPawn) and I'm curious to know what you think about the following opening variation that I decided on my own during a game. Since the game is still in progress and I wouldn't like to cheat by asking tips from anybody, I only give the first few moves. It has developed into a really interesting game, where I swopped a knight for three pawns and has reached a complicated position where I have a lot more space. In another blitz game, I also played this variation and won, but what was interesting is that that game developed completely different, with long pawn chains constricting piece movement, which made the game slow.
Anyway, what do you think? Is it sound? Is it actually being played? (As I mentioned, my knowledge of openings is not that good.)
Starts as the french defense as far as im concerned, but the cramping of the pawns isnt advisable. Perfectly sound apart from the fact that black loses a vital pawn.
No pawns lost here. I guess white still has good attacking changes, but the structure of his queen side pawns are screwed up. Black has good chances along the open c file. The next couple of moves were very interesting (I've played further than that (move 34) so there's no chance of cheating...). I think white screwed up a bit and allowed black to start an attack on the queen side, gaining more space in the process. But so far I don't think the advantage is conclusive.
BTW I was playing as black, sorry for the misunderstanding at the beginning. I new here. :P
This line actually looks pretty interesting. White pretty much has to give up a pawn after Qc7, not Ne7. But White may have compensation. You never know.
7. Qg4 looks a lot better than 7. bxc3. If black ever takes the b pawn, white will retake with his bishop and have nice piece placement that is worth a pawn. (open file for the rook; bishop on long diagonal; the queen on g4 with pawn on e5 plus lack of dark squared bishop kingside hard to defend)
I guess so, Qc7 instead of Ne7 might have been even more effective. Interestingly, White still failed to keep his e pawn. I'm beginning to wonder if White should play something other than a3. In any case, this is by no means a win for Black of course. But I think Black's position is at least solid. Anyway, I'll post the full game once it's over. Thanks for the comments.
This variation seems so much better than ...Bxc3 check!
Interesting point. Guess it's true. Black will probably go Ne7 and sac the g pawn for an open file for his rook (Rg8), if White accepts the pawn. With White able to keep the e pawn and good piece activity, Black's King stuck in the centre it certainly looks better for White. Thanks. This should make an interesting game.
well there had to be some reason why it's used so little in master play.
Here's an interesting line from this variation.
In this line of the winawer 7 bxc3 isnt so good even though it scores better than 50%, both 7 Qg4 and 7 Nf3 score over 70% for white ! This would explain why we dont see this line at the higher levels, no ?
nice find bondiggity
Um... Reb? Out of how many games?
7 Qg4 107 games
7 Nf3 71 games
7 bxc3 87 games
Wow. I had no idea there were so many games with this. Also, instead of axb4, then White can play the simple Qxd4 e.g. Nc6 Bb5 with a level game.
why would white want a level game when axb4 clearly gives white advantage?
Does it really clearly give White an advantage? It has yet to be proven. In a tournament, I would probably play Qxd4 because axb4 leads to the kind of positions that I am uncomfortable with.
I both 7 Qg4 and 7 Nf3 score over 70% for white !
I think 70% win is a clear refutation
I don't think that many players familiar with the French would castle into the "Greek Gift".
But a decent gambit overall.
2/26/2015 - Nedelkovic - Gaprindashvili, Leningrad 1964
by JosephGuo2005 a few minutes ago
2/27/2015 - Securing The Win
by mohandisusa a few minutes ago
2/18/2015 - Mate in 2
by LaGr77 a few minutes ago
2/17/2015 - Persistent Pressure
by LaGr77 2 minutes ago
2/22/2015 - Mate in 3
by LaGr77 3 minutes ago
2/19/2015 - Lev Alburt vs Vasily Byvshev, Moscow, 1965
by LaGr77 4 minutes ago
2/16/2015 - Johannes Addicks vs. Mladen Gudjev, Prague, 1931
by LaGr77 7 minutes ago
2/15/2015 - Must Know Pattern
by LaGr77 8 minutes ago
2/14/2015 - Zukertort-Englisch, London 1883
2/11/2015 - Up And Over
by LaGr77 10 minutes ago
Why Join | Chess Topics |
Help & Support |
© 2015 Chess.com
• Chess - English
We are working hard to make Chess.com available in over 70 languages. Check back over the year as we develop the technology to add more, and we will try our best to notify you when your language is ready for translating!