8790 Players currently online!
Man vs. Machine - good luck!
Turn-based games at any time!
Vote for the best move to win!
Do you have what it takes?
Sharpen your tactical vision!
Get advice and game insights!
Learn from top players & pros!
View millions of master games!
Your virtual chess coach!
Perfect your opening moves!
Test your skills vs. computer!
Find the right private coach!
Can you solve it each day?
Bring it all together!
Beginners, start here!
Make friends & play team games!
News from the world of chess!
Search all Chess.com members!
Find local clubs & events!
Who's the best of your friends?
Read what members are saying!
i123thebugs
Hi,
I am organizing a tournament of 4 hours in length, 7.30-11.30pm
There will be an estimated 10-15 participants.
The clock will be set on sudden-death mode and time will be 10 minutes
In the previous year, I used the system elimination with repecharge and the player only plays one game (color determined by a coin toss)
I don't think the previous system is very fair. Hence, I am contemplating to use the Swiss-system and each player will play both black and white against everyone.
However, I only have 6 chess sets and I am not sure whether using the Swiss-system will allow the tournament to be completed in time.
Is there any better system that I can use to make sure that it's as fair and punctual as possible?
Any advice appreciated! Many thanks.
mnag
You can do it with a Swiss, all you need is four rounds for less than 16 players. That said, you need to start on time, have the scores reported quickly and have the pairings done quickly. You have to keep on the players, they will want to discuss their games after they finish and not start the next one. Keep bugging them to start the next game quickly. And pair the next round as quickly as you can. You may need to borrow a set or two and I hope you have a sufficient number of clocks. Good Luck.
So a swiss with time/round limit.
Thanks for the advice, I use the chess clock in iphone/laptop for the clocks. It's unfortunate but there is insufficient budget to purchase that many clocks.
if there are wide variances in the ratings of the players, you may want to consider using Quads instead of a Swiss. The idea is that like-rated players would play each other in groups of 4. Since everyone in a Quad is playing each other and the order in which they play each other is known, you could start games as soon as the players are ready. A G/10 quad could finish in under 1 hour.
Correct me if I am wrong, quads is equivalent to round-robbin?
In using the quads system you mentioned, is the champion of each group supposed to meet off and battle it off for the top position?
And, what happen if the total number of participants is not divisible by 4?
Martin_Stahl
I don't think there's any free pairing software for Swiss that can go more than 2 rounds, but with < 20 people it won't be that difficult to do by hand.
Vega is free for less then 30 players and 100% free if run on Linux. I used it for the first 3 or 4 tournaments I ran and it is a decent program. Has some bugs when it comes to generating rating reports for the USCF (easily worked around) but for a use such as this, that won't matter.
Ah, thanks everyone for the insight.
I think I will use the accelerated Swiss mode limitted to number of rounds or time as adviced by mnag. Probably play as many games as the time allows.
A question I have for mr shadow is that, let's say the game goes by round robin, does each player has to play white and black?
And I am wondering whether there are tournaments that makes players play 2 board against each other at the same time?
5/21/2013 - The Power of Imagination
by robvdb 5 minutes ago
Online Store Purchase Outside of US
by BorgQueen 6 minutes ago
18 Queens and two Knights
by Bur_Oak 10 minutes ago
After Ruy Lopez
by solidknight 10 minutes ago
King's Gambit quickie
by andreint 12 minutes ago
Conclusions of my research
by jinnd319 21 minutes ago
I am so much happier now that I'm playing people worse than me.
by reflectivist 21 minutes ago
new official FIDE WCC chess set
by Bur_Oak 22 minutes ago
Computer Analysis says 1...c5 is an Inaccuracy ???
by Kikyo_Sushi 23 minutes ago
Ponziani Opening
by C-nack 26 minutes ago