12246 Players currently online!
Man vs. Machine - good luck!
Turn-based games at any time!
Vote for the best move to win!
Do you have what it takes?
Sharpen your tactical vision!
Get advice and game insights!
Learn from top players & pros!
View millions of master games!
Your virtual chess coach!
Perfect your opening moves!
Test your skills vs. computer!
Find the right private coach!
Can you solve it each day?
Bring it all together!
Beginners, start here!
Make friends & play team games!
News from the world of chess!
Search all Chess.com members!
Find local clubs & events!
Who's the best of your friends?
Read what members are saying!
Brother of Sir- don- ic.
Personally, I liked the good old days when neither satire or sarcasm was necessary. You just told called the fool f**king stupid and got smacked down or not. Not being the thin-skinned political correctness police censors of today, first guy to hit the floor bought the next round and the winner racked the pool table. What problem? That tooth popped right back in! No harm no foul.
The best thing about getting old is getting away with being a curmudgeon!
Academics types, please continue. It might be the most intelligent discussion I've read on line for a while.
i think it boils down to jealousy. people ban highly intelligent people from their forums so they don't continue to upstage them and steal their glory. it's a form of predjudice and it needs to stop!
Yes of course, milord. If a fully incompetent user starts a thread with a rather ridiculous question who had obviously put no thought process behind his idea in the first place, then a "sarcastic" person comes along and makes an example out of him using a really good point, then that incompetent user is definetly going to get offended. He may even start a pointless argument, or even worse, a flame war! So to avoid all that butt-hurt, he just simply bans that "sarcastic" user.
“Interviewer: 'So Frank, you have long hair. Does that make you a woman?'
at last, a truly intelligent person who is willing to speak the truth. kudos kind sir, kudos
Thank you sire, thank you.
i've developed using excessive sarcasm at work because punching someone in their mouth is frowned upon by management
Best display some decorum.
That doesn't work for me. I need to walk away, because the closer I am to those people, the more than likely I will be able to hear them.
Sarcasim showes over zealous Good for determination
i have never been banned for being sarcastic
just wait. either your sarcasm lacks the appropriate sting, or you haven't found the right loser yet.
Either that or his posts just get deleted, which he didn't mention. My sarcasm comes in memes sometimes and chess.com has a "image spamming" policy, EVEN IF THE MEME IS CHESS RELATED!!!
yeddy, Exactly! Sarcasm is an evolutionary advancemet in a humanistic society. Though, slapping some fool silly to straighten him out is probably a better social tool for the species survival. Thus, we are to civilized to preserve a strong evolutionary social structure and eventually the idiots will take over (more) and we'll be made to not use sarcasm in retaurants, stores and such. Small groups of people huddled outside an Applebys being snarky about the fools inside, scaring away the smokers and helping stop cancer! Therefore, we should be applauded for our civic responsibility, since we do everything right and know it because others do it differently and they dress funny.
I love chess.
and, in an utter worst case scenario, i've been blocked from commenting on a certain forum which means the 'tracking comments' option isn't available for me to un-check. this leaves me completly helpless against receiving an update anytime someone posts to the topic. simply awful.
Just ignore it, we have all been there.
if you are blocked from posting in a forum then there is no 'tracking comments' option at the bottom of the page to un-check. so, in effect, i receive the alerts when someone posts but cannot comment back or remove my tracking!
breaking news for chess.com forum users: rumour has it that the staff at chess.com are looking into the logistics of billing a surcharge of $0.05 everytime a user makes a snide remark. furthermore studies at harvard and yale have shown that users of sarcasm are twice as likely to think twice before speaking if such levies are imposed. interesting, huh?
Some of us will soon be bankrupt then.
i know, right? with every waking breath, it is all that i can do to not post degrading comments on some of these forums!
If You Could Fix One Thing On Chess.com, What Would It Be?
by HessianWarrior a few minutes ago
Ebonized Pieces Suck...
by baddogno a few minutes ago
12/27/2014 - Levenfish-Ryumin, Moscow 1936
by glsmith a few minutes ago
Admins: Spam alert, you may wish to check this
by chessplayer31415926 3 minutes ago
You Don't Think Cheating is a Serious Problem?
by LongIslandMark 5 minutes ago
People playing the queen early
by XPLAYERJX 5 minutes ago
by redtrucker 6 minutes ago
Traditional openings vs. opening systems
by XPLAYERJX 8 minutes ago
The Backyard Professor
by XPLAYERJX 13 minutes ago
a picture of a broken chess player
by kleelof 13 minutes ago
Why Join | Chess Topics |
Help & Support |
© 2014 Chess.com
• Chess - English
We are working hard to make Chess.com available in over 70 languages. Check back over the year as we develop the technology to add more, and we will try our best to notify you when your language is ready for translating!