AWARDCHESS and Erik

Jump to forum:
« Previous | 1 2 | Next » | Last Post
10th September 2008, 02:04am
#1
by pinapplebrainDerek
Melbourne City Australia
Member Since: Jun 2008
Member Points: 401

There are some people like AWARDCHESS who love heaps of games and take the MOST time in moving, I dont even think AWARDCHESS even thinks about his move because I'm playing him now and I'm only 10 and he's definitely higher than my age. That's why I think people should have a limit of games.

People such as Erik should be banned because people are probably to scared to play him because if he's losing he might just shut Chess.com down you know it not really nice. So I reckon we should have somebody who actually doesn't do that and doesn't care soo about his games.

I think that people should have a limit and stay on the limit and don't go over alot. I think AWARDCHESS's is something like 1000.

10th September 2008, 08:35am
#2
by artfizz
South (GMT) +rT United Kingdom
Member Since: May 2008
Member Points: 3169

pinapplebrainDerek wrote: ... People such as Erik should be banned because people are probably to scared to play him because if he's losing he might just shut Chess.com down you know it not really nice. So I reckon we should have somebody who actually doesn't do that and doesn't care soo about his games. ...

That's partly why there is a small, trusty band of staff (jay, igor, piotr, helfstm - http://www.chess.com/forum/view/chess-organizers/admin-staffsurrounding Erik - to prevent him from doing anything silly.

Worry about how to beat Erik first, and only then worry about how he might take it.

10th September 2008, 09:16am
#3
by rich
My Home United Kingdom
Member Since: Jul 2007
Member Points: 22737

If your saying AWARDCHESS's rating is only meant to be 1000, you are wrong it's always around 1750 has he is now. If he had less games in progress he might even be a 1900 !

10th September 2008, 09:30am
#4
by artfizz
South (GMT) +rT United Kingdom
Member Since: May 2008
Member Points: 3169

pinapplebrainDerek wrote: There are some people like AWARDCHESS who love heaps of games and take the MOST time in moving, I dont even think AWARDCHESS even thinks about his move because I'm playing him now and I'm only 10 and he's definitely higher than my age. That's why I think people should have a limit of games. ... I think that people should have a limit and stay on the limit and don't go over alot. I think AWARDCHESS's is something like 1000.

 


 rich wrote: If your saying AWARDCHESS's rating is only meant to be 1000, you are wrong it's always around 1750 has he is now. If he had less games in progress he might even be a 1900 !

pinapplebrainDerek is likely to be referring to the number of games in progress that AWARDCHESS has - slightly less than 1000.  AWARDCHESS still manages to beat a lot of people (including me!), organise loads of tournaments for everyone's benefit and post a great deal in the Forums.

If there should be limits on chess.com, the limit I would like to see if an upper band of % of games won. 80% should be quite high enough for anyone. 

10th September 2008, 09:34am
#5
by rich
My Home United Kingdom
Member Since: Jul 2007
Member Points: 22737

Dirty. But I clean my teeth every day.

21st September 2008, 10:59am
#6
by AWARDCHESS
Los Angeles United States
Member Since: May 2008
Member Points: 21575

Thank you for my support!..

 There is a limit for everything personal done.

 I am currently looking for my mind limits at Chess.

Beside that site, I played more than 250 games online.

And here, I got 1,074 more.

 As long as I manage my games, I am OK!

 If I lost, I lost!

 What is the problems?

 All Olympic players looking to broaden their mind and body limits.

Who gonna ban or bite them for their great experience?

We are free to go..., or not free, at all!

 Play Chess!

Beat me at Chess, if you can dare it!?

Let me joy my Joy!

Grow Up! not down...

 

Games
Total: 2246
Won: 1374 (61%)
Lost: 702 (31%)
Drawn: 170 (8%)
Unrated: 133
In Progress: 1074

Moves
Timeouts: 0 (0%)
Avg./game: 28
Time/move: 1 hr 48 mins

23rd September 2008, 04:52pm
#7
by dmeng
Knoxville, TN United States
Member Since: Jul 2008
Member Points: 308

Hehe, I'm playing AWARDCHESS right now in a tournament. To be honest, I entirely expect my score in that tournament to be no more than around 2-3 out of 22. Am I going to beat AWARDCHESS? Doubtful, but we'll see.

23rd September 2008, 05:17pm
#8
by jhuschstp
St. Paul United States
Member Since: May 2008
Member Points: 234

I'm also playing awardchess right now! I plan to beat him! Bring it on awardchess!

23rd September 2008, 05:33pm
#9
by DXBrea
Alberta Canada
Member Since: Aug 2008
Member Points: 105

I want to play AWARDCHESS too....

23rd September 2008, 05:42pm
#10
by KilgoreBass
United States
Member Since: May 2008
Member Points: 143
jhuschstp wrote:

I'm also playing awardchess right now! I plan to beat him! Bring it on awardchess!


If you are in a tournament, odds are you are playing AWARDCHESS.......I don't know how he manages so many games, but I think I am getting the hang of his "style"......

PS: I still am a believer that you "play your opponent, not the game"..........if you play the same person enough, you understand their patterns, and they understand yours.....but maybe AWARDCHESS plays so many games this is harder for him (??)......anyway, that's how I usually play a stronger opponent...... learn their weakness......maybe AWARDCHESS is too "spread out" to remember those of all his opponents, but he obviously loves the game, and does not mind.....

23rd September 2008, 06:27pm
#11
by dmeng
Knoxville, TN United States
Member Since: Jul 2008
Member Points: 308
dmeng wrote:

Hehe, I'm playing AWARDCHESS right now in a tournament. To be honest, I entirely expect my score in that tournament to be no more than around 2-3 out of 22. Am I going to beat AWARDCHESS? Doubtful, but we'll see.


UPDATE: One user withdrew, so my new goal is 5/22...lol

23rd September 2008, 07:01pm
#12
by wormrose
Lake Tahoe, NV United States
Member Since: Feb 2008
Member Points: 2446

There probably should be a rule against saying rude things about people who you are actively engaged in playing. There's not much difference between what you've said about AWARDCHESS in this forum and making rude remarks to him directly. It's actually more rude (and more cowardly) to use an open forum as you have done here. If AWARDCHESS (or anyone else) is playing within the rules. Then shut up!

24th September 2008, 11:41am
#13
by AWARDCHESS
Los Angeles United States
Member Since: May 2008
Member Points: 21575

Hold the right line to beat AWARDCHESS... at Chess!

Be patient! Wait, until I fall asleep, behind the chess board... It happen, sometimes!..

 Wait your right time and attack together, to be sure, that I will not use a Castaneda's knowledges of Magic, or Suvorov's hard Training of "The Science of Victory".

You have good chances at the Saturday's playing until Monday's afternoon...

Do not miss your fortune!

24th September 2008, 11:43am
#14
by AWARDCHESS
Los Angeles United States
Member Since: May 2008
Member Points: 21575
Rating
Current: 1763
Highest: 1846 (18 Sep 2008)
Avg. Opp.: 1555
Best Win: 2253 (albatros1)
Today's Rank: #2995 of 47,134 (93.6%)

 

Games
Total: 2295
Won: 1412 (62%)
Lost: 710 (31%)
Drawn: 173 (8%)
Unrated: 145
In Progress: 1135

 

Moves
Timeouts: 0 (0%)
Avg./game: 28
Time/move: 2 hrs 10 mins

24th September 2008, 11:44am
#15
by AWARDCHESS
Los Angeles United States
Member Since: May 2008
Member Points: 21575

Tournaments
Events Entered: 312
Leaderboard Points: 2,943
1st Place Finishes: 34
2nd Place Finishes: 0
3rd Place Finishes: 1
Withdrawals: 0
Tournaments Hosted: 47
Total # Players Hosted: 185

Tournament Games
Total: 2,141
Won: 1,303 (60.9%)
Lost: 675 (31.5%)
Drawn: 163 (7.6%)
In Progress: 1,092
24th September 2008, 12:03pm
#16
by linksspringer
Scotland, UK Netherlands
Member Since: Aug 2007
Member Points: 6232

I think there should be a new setting for tournament directors:
Allow participation by AWARDCHESS:   yes/no

 

Wink

24th September 2008, 12:24pm
#17
by uritbon
tel aviv Israel
Member Since: Apr 2008
Member Points: 1000

reading the posts made me think...

AWARDCHESS.

1. how do you manage to play so many games? do you remember who you are playing? do you sometimes manage to have conversations on the chat?

2. were you to lose all your games on time... would that hurt? :P

24th September 2008, 04:26pm
#18
by AWARDCHESS
Los Angeles United States
Member Since: May 2008
Member Points: 21575

"'Allow participation by AWARDCHESS:   yes/no"

Actually, I am TD! I organized 100 Tournaments?

 So, I can play on my Tournaments, even with oneself, if nobody brave enough to play me!

"1. how do you manage to play so many games? do you remember who you are playing? do you sometimes manage to have conversations on the chat?

2. were you to lose all your games on time... would that hurt? :P"

I manage my games,

 I remember most of players and interesting games.

I chat with many of persons.

I will not be lost on time game, even I got a big problems with wireless Internet!

 


24th September 2008, 11:34pm
#19
by pinapplebrainDerek
Melbourne City Australia
Member Since: Jun 2008
Member Points: 401

im ten and im beating awardchess by a rook!

24th September 2008, 11:51pm
#20
by demonicvanguard
Nebraska United States
Member Since: Jan 2008
Member Points: 56

Very nice....It looks like you have a winning position. According to your profile you are 13+ (Birthday: May 26, 1995).....Did you lose track of a few years or does time calculate different in Australia?Smile

« Previous | 1 2 | Next » | Last Post

Add your comment:

Join Chess.com for free to add your comment! Already a member? Then login now to comment.