15520 Players currently online!
Man vs. Machine - good luck!
Turn-based games at any time!
Vote for the best move to win!
Do you have what it takes?
Sharpen your tactical vision!
Get advice and game insights!
Learn from top players & pros!
View millions of master games!
Your virtual chess coach!
Perfect your opening moves!
Test your skills vs. computer!
Find the right private coach!
Can you solve it each day?
Bring it all together!
Beginners, start here!
Make friends & play team games!
News from the world of chess!
Search all Chess.com members!
Find local clubs & events!
Who's the best of your friends?
Read what members are saying!
Last week I went to a reunion chess match of people I was at secondary school with. We had a great time, playing chess, chatting and watching a tournament (see http://blog.chess.com/ArnesonStidgeley/bournemouth-school-old-boys---2012 if you're having a slow afternoon).
There were ten of us - all born in the 1960s. What struck me was that only three of us had married and only two of those unions had produced children (and no children outside those).
What does that show - if anything?
A sample of 10 people from the same school?
It shows you need more data
it doesnt show anything :)
statistics doesnt apply in every corner of life. or you will imply that if a butterfly move its wings a tornado will appear somewhere else :)
It shows you need more data
Hello, Waffle and ionutg
Here's where we need the stats nerds: in any given sample of ten men born in the 60s, what is the number of child-bearing unions (or marriages) that will result? I would have thought that the mean would be around five, with 95% confidence limits of one to nine. Two - as in this sample - seems low.
Our school was a 'state grammar' school - ie, tax-payer funded and entrance based on results of an entrance exam taken at the age of 11. Students were therefore academically able.
Well, yeah that's reasonable I guess, but there's sure to be many groups of 10 who have 0 marriages. Sure if it's something like 6 standard deviations out there, it's unlikely, but how many groups of 10 are there from 1960's schools? Millions I'd guess. So 2 marriages doesn't seem extraordinary... maybe if you'd all been married 4 times each heh.
No matter the skill of the statistician, your calculations can't be better than your data, and I think we'd all agree a sample of 10 is pretty small :)
The minimum sample size in statistics is 30.
It all depends on what the general probability of marriage in general is. "The internet" may claim 70% or 90% on average. The table below shows the distribution (what percentage of the time will a random group of 10 people have so many marriages) based on simple combinatorics for various underlying probabilities (50% change of getting married means look at the "0.5" column. In any case, your outcome appears fairly unlikely. For the nerds, this is just a tabulation of p^k*(1-p)^(10-k)*(10 choose k).
10/30/2014 - Clever Mating Sequence
by arun119 3 minutes ago
Invent the new worst/most useless chess piece ever!
by Ballofwhacks 12 minutes ago
How many hours to reach 2000 blitz elo?
by Reb 13 minutes ago
by AaronGo 15 minutes ago
8/3/2014 - Mate in 2
by EulerTheToiler 25 minutes ago
Your Questions about Chess
by MainlineNovelty 25 minutes ago
Any general comments?
by aggressivesociopath 31 minutes ago
chess.com ratings are deflated against USCF
by Martin_Stahl 31 minutes ago
Want names for these situations...
by MainlineNovelty 32 minutes ago
by Iluvsmetuna 32 minutes ago
Why Join | Chess Topics |
Help & Support |
© 2014 Chess.com
• Chess - English
We are working hard to make Chess.com available in over 70 languages. Check back over the year as we develop the technology to add more, and we will try our best to notify you when your language is ready for translating!