16719 Players currently online!
Man vs. Machine - good luck!
Turn-based games at any time!
Vote for the best move to win!
Do you have what it takes?
Sharpen your tactical vision!
Get advice and game insights!
Learn from top players & pros!
View millions of master games!
Your virtual chess coach!
Perfect your opening moves!
Test your skills vs. computer!
Find the right private coach!
Can you solve it each day?
Bring it all together!
Beginners, start here!
Make friends & play team games!
News from the world of chess!
Search all Chess.com members!
Find local clubs & events!
Who's the best of your friends?
Read what members are saying!
At least that's what an appallingly large number of people on here seem to think. Because they don't believe in talent. As for me, I disagree.
Yes, there's not even an attempt to match the style of the original troll.
No talent for trolling I guess.
I'm serious. Some people on here don't believe in talent.
What's so inflammatory about it?
Dull. Let's spice this up.
It's not too late to change the title of the forum.
They don't sell that where I'm at.
Being on occasion subject to conspiracy theories I of course suspect there is something untoward going on here. With my razzor-sharp wit I have noticed that all of the people involved in this thread so far have over 3,000 member points. Hmmm very very odd I must say. I'll have to radio the secret Saceship out beyond Mars to get more info. Might be able to post more later, then again things may have to be kept quiet --- --- ---
Just because they did not like Fischer as a person they deny his talents as having merrit.
Fischer was not the nicest guy in the world, but he could sure play chess like the best of them.
Hitler was not the nicest guy in the world either, but he sure was a great public speaker.
These people don't believe anybody has any talent because "There is no such thing as talent." It's just a matter of how much you study. Common sense says that's not so.
Yeah, I think it's on the basis of threads like this that Godwin's law was formulated.
Okay is there any really "Nice Chess Heros" or any really "Nice Dictators"?
I agree with woodshover. If talent did not exist, we would not have prodigies of any kind. How can one explain the phenomenon of Capablanca or Sultan Khan or Carlsen without referring to their talent, as an inborn quality?
Instead of having a pity party about how untalented we think we are, some of us simply work harder to be proficient in whatever we do. Because of this whether talent exists or not is unimportant.
But some people like to complain and that is their prerogative.
"FIDE Grand Prix - Round 9 | Hosts: GMs Evgeny Miroshnichenko & Viorel Iordachescu"
Anatoly Karpov is 64!
by stuzzicadenti 2 minutes ago
en passant = Cheater!
by alex-rodriguez 4 minutes ago
Main ideas for white in the Open Sicilian?
by airborne71 5 minutes ago
Which is most dominant country on chess.com?
by MelvinDoucet 8 minutes ago
The two most f'd up situations
by Knightly_News 9 minutes ago
Chess Tutor (Shredder)
by kleelof 19 minutes ago
How old is chess.com
by notmtwain 19 minutes ago
Are tactics really the way to go?
by Madness20 23 minutes ago
by kenardi 26 minutes ago
NOJ Dubrovnik and FIDE Regulations
by Reb 28 minutes ago
Why Join | Chess Topics |
Help & Support |
© 2015 Chess.com
• Chess - English
We are working hard to make Chess.com available in over 70 languages. Check back over the year as we develop the technology to add more, and we will try our best to notify you when your language is ready for translating!