Interenet Chess has lost its appeal

Jump to forum:
« Previous | 1 2 | Next » | Last Post
5th August 2009, 04:15am
#21
by Medic1992
United Kingdom
Member Since: Aug 2009
Member Points: 2
[COMMENT DELETED]
5th August 2009, 06:53am
#22
by harlandorado
Oslo Norway
Member Since: Jan 2008
Member Points: 2
richie_and_oprah wrote:

The point is to win, at all cost, and to deprive the opponent from victory and any spoils that may bring.


You don't actually win when you're cheating. It looks like a win, but it's in fact a different game..

5th August 2009, 07:00am
#23
by CPawn
Sacramento, California United States
Member Since: Aug 2008
Member Points: 780

Anytime you have the human element involved in anything, there will be those that chose to cheat.  For what purpose?  There are many answers that can be debated for years.

5th August 2009, 07:37am
#24
by DrawMaster
United States
Member Since: Dec 2008
Member Points: 607

I played OTB for many years, and enjoyed it.

However, there are a number of reasons that this venue appeals to me:

  1. We no longer have a local club in the immediate area, forcing me to a 90-mile round trip if I want to play chess competitively,
  2. The typical cost of club play was roughly $1-to-$2 per hour, for venue rental and ratings fees whereas even Diamond membership here costs only $2 per week,
  3. Each evening, I saw the same chess players week in and week out for years on end, with only a slow trickle of new blood entering while hundreds of new players enter chess.com on a weekly basis,
  4. While the occasional lesson was given at the club, access to training materials like those at chess.com was non-existent (yes, the Internet was non-existent for some of that period), and finally,
  5. I could not play chess at 3AM in my pajamas at the local club ... OK, I could if I were willing to be arrested.
So ... while OTB is still a great venue, I'm guessing there are many who find that this medium is a great alternative in many, many cases --- and is in no danger of disappearing anytime soon. (At least not until we can use thought transfer to play a game of chess over the ether.)
5th August 2009, 12:33pm
#25
by mowque
PA United States
Member Since: Apr 2008
Member Points: 337

Drawmaster- Wise words indeed. #1 is the main reason for many of us, including me.

5th August 2009, 02:40pm
#26
by AnthonyCG
Washington DC United States
Member Since: Aug 2007
Member Points: 2839
Number 1 for me. Even worse is that the chances of getting a fair 30 minute game are non-existant so when I go to tournaments I'm not really prepared...
13th December 2009, 07:50pm
#27
by shaunzilla
Chapel Hill, North Carolina United States
Member Since: Aug 2009
Member Points: 57

this is why i appreciate internet chess for what it is. a chance to improve and have fun. i dont encounter cheaters all that often, and i still enjoy myself, so no big deal. i agree that cheating is pointless and it would be better if no one did it, but i believe internet chess' long and glorious reign will live on.Laughing

13th December 2009, 08:33pm
#28
by tyzebug
Unknown Singapore
Member Since: May 2009
Member Points: 181
jkpastorius wrote:

In any case, I've just solved for a win for White after 1 h3.  I was going to post it -- there are surprisingly few variations, actually -- but then even over-the-board chess would lose its appeal for the original poster and many others on this site.  On second thought, it's probably better for humanity if I destroy this solution once and for all ... [drags file to recycling bin] 


Please tell me you're being sarcastic.

13th December 2009, 08:38pm
#29
by essnov
Montreal Canada
Member Since: Sep 2009
Member Points: 163
tyzebug wrote:

Please tell me you're being sarcastic.


 

Please tell me you're being sarcastic.

« Previous | 1 2 | Next » | Last Post

Add your comment:

Join Chess.com for free to add your comment! Already a member? Then login now to comment.