Upgrade to Chess.com Premium!

Lowest Rating

Jump to forum:
 
9th June 2009, 02:05pm
#1
by BlackKnight12
Venice Italy
Member Since: Nov 2008
Member Points: 73

I want to know who the lowest ranked player on this site is.  If you think you have a really low rating show it to me.  If you know someone who has a low rating send me there username or a link.  Thanks

9th June 2009, 02:18pm
#2
by turkey_12345act
A Secret Place United States
Member Since: Nov 2008
Member Points: 367
9th June 2009, 02:26pm
#3
by da_tornado
Honolulu United States
Member Since: Mar 2009
Member Points: 1046

How did that happen?

9th June 2009, 02:28pm
#4
by DaPharaoh
Gaithersburg, MD United States
Member Since: Oct 2007
Member Points: 1411

I didn't think it was possible..

I can't wait until someone achieves a negative rating :)

9th June 2009, 02:31pm
#5
by turkey_12345act
A Secret Place United States
Member Since: Nov 2008
Member Points: 367
da_tornado wrote:

How did that happen?


 Uh . . . cat on the keyboard when playing this guy? =D

9th June 2009, 02:41pm
#6
by richie_and_oprah
Marie Byrd Land United States
Member Since: Feb 2009
Member Points: 1861

Compelling.  Smile

9th June 2009, 02:53pm
#7
by rich
United Kingdom
Member Since: Jul 2007
Member Points: 27854
9th June 2009, 03:37pm
#8
by turkey_12345act
A Secret Place United States
Member Since: Nov 2008
Member Points: 367
rich wrote:

 That's the second link I posted. :)

9th June 2009, 03:49pm
#9
by KingAlex24
New Jersey United States
Member Since: Sep 2008
Member Points: 95

i think it has to be done on purpose, theres no way you can be that retarded, either way the second guy has a bunch of games that he has lost after the second move where there is no mate, so he is just losing on time after the second move, obviously on purpose, as for the first guy idk those positions are gonna give me knightmares

9th June 2009, 03:54pm
#10
by richie_and_oprah
Marie Byrd Land United States
Member Since: Feb 2009
Member Points: 1861

On a chess site where people win 200 games with 2 loses I am thinking the opposite reality could be equally feasible.

 

Of course, the belief that both are wholly organic and natural occurances should be met with approved therapy and suitable pharmeceuticals.

9th June 2009, 05:20pm
#11
by BlackKnight12
Venice Italy
Member Since: Nov 2008
Member Points: 73

this is great thanks to all who have gave me information.

9th June 2009, 05:26pm
#12
by BlackKnight12
Venice Italy
Member Since: Nov 2008
Member Points: 73
KingAlex24 wrote:

i think it has to be done on purpose, theres no way you can be that retarded, either way the second guy has a bunch of games that he has lost after the second move where there is no mate, so he is just losing on time after the second move, obviously on purpose, as for the first guy idk those positions are gonna give me knightmares


 I agree completly

 

Add your comment:

Join Chess.com for free to add your comment! Already a member? Then login now to comment.