11962 Players currently online!
Man vs. Machine - good luck!
Turn-based games at any time!
Vote for the best move to win!
Do you have what it takes?
Backgammon, Yatzy, and more!
Sharpen your tactical vision!
Get advice and game insights!
Learn from top players & pros!
View millions of master games!
Your virtual chess coach!
Perfect your opening moves!
Test your skills vs. computer!
Find the right private coach!
Can you solve it each day?
Bring it all together!
Beginners, start here!
Make friends & play team games!
News from the world of chess!
Search all Chess.com members!
Find local clubs & events!
Who's the best of your friends?
Read what members are saying!
To each his own. Cool down!
Bronstein imo. A good second and third for me would be Keres and Korchnoi and Nimzowitsch on four. But that's a personal taste.
Bronstien was one win away from snatching the title from Botvinnik...
Yusupov was great, but he was a distant third, along with the likes of Jan Timman & Korchnoi in the late 80s and early 90s.
One of my favorite players from that time was Jon Speelman.
If you spent less time in chess history and more on the actual game you might have reached a good level in chess.
You're in over your head.
Kramnik, lol, it is obvious Victor Korchnio
The Pride of Italy.
korchnoi and Italy relation?
I think that may have been a reference to the spelling.
Or the misspelling rather.
Kiss my butt.
Chess history rocks!
(And now that you mention it, are you really comparing your rating to Smyslovfans?)
I'm not so insecure that i'd look at someone's rating to give him my advice. And since you're convinced that my rating is really my rating then I'd ask you to look at my games. Even someone as ignorant as you wont be able to miss the fact that I only ever use one opening.
I'm not passionate about chess and thats why havent bothered to improve myself. But this smyslov fan seems to be passionate about the game and thats why my advice.
You are though admittedly a priceless vagaband of the forum.
But Kramnik was world champion. He not only defeated Kasparov for the title (I think it's one of history's greatest upsets, I was going to do a thread on that actually with Euwe defeating Alekhine, Tal defeating Botvinnik and Steinitz successfully defending his title against Chigorin being candidates for biggest upsets in history) but defended his title against Topalov, who blew away the competition at San Luis 2005.
As for my answer it's hard to say, but Chigorin, Rubinstein, Keres, Korchnoi, and Caruana are very strong candidates.
Oogie I agree with your selections - there are many great players who could potentially have become world champion. It only just ocurred to me, but maybe Bent Larsen should be on that list too.
Caruana doesn't count for the same reasons that Carlsen didn't count two years ago :)
Bent Larsen himself has said that there were simply better players than him at the time he was trying to become champion. Not sure if that rules him out though. But it seems he wouldn't consider himself :-/
I still think Tarrash is a good bet. He was very, very strong at his prime.
by 0jayrage a few minutes ago
Chess960 is severely misunderstood.
by bauta 3 minutes ago
The most interesting game of chess was played here in chess.com !!!!
by MarcoBR444 8 minutes ago
Frustration with Blitz
by Veganomnomnom 15 minutes ago
Which Anti-Sicilian to choose?
by Veganomnomnom 16 minutes ago
Yes I " Might " disable chat
by Supastan 19 minutes ago
Please help with the position
by HueyWilliams 20 minutes ago
I sacrified a knight! :)
by HueyWilliams 23 minutes ago
What would be the rating of a top chess player in the late 1800s today
by HueyWilliams 25 minutes ago
PROVE THAT THERE IS LUCK IN CHESS EVEN ON 2000+ LEVEL!
by HueyWilliams 26 minutes ago
Why Join | Chess Topics |
Help & Support |
© 2015 Chess.com
• Chess - English
We are working hard to make Chess.com available in over 70 languages. Check back over the year as we develop the technology to add more, and we will try our best to notify you when your language is ready for translating!