Upgrade to Chess.com Premium!

The Best Player Never to Become World Champion?


  • 2 years ago · Quote · #21

    Archaic71

    Bronstein

  • 2 years ago · Quote · #22

    Archaic71

    15 . . . exf4?

  • 2 years ago · Quote · #23

    herbanmusic

    By the way- Can i vote for myself?

  • 2 years ago · Quote · #24

    jim995

    Bronstein, Keres, and Carlsen.

  • 2 years ago · Quote · #25

    El_Gremio

    viktor korchnoi

  • 2 years ago · Quote · #26

    ChessforFunn

    LiamMuRpHy wrote:

    Lasker,Capablanca,Tal and of course Anand


     They've all been WC and my thought is Morphy(had he been born later), Rubinstein,

    and Nimzovitch.

  • 2 years ago · Quote · #27

    herbanmusic

    Sultan Mir Khan could have been close to it had he enjoyed playing the game, instead of playing it to please his master or follow his orders.

  • 2 years ago · Quote · #28

    trysts

    Polgar would have destroyed Keres! Keres couldn't wash her nylonsLaughing

  • 2 years ago · Quote · #29

    batgirl

    What's that got to do with washing nylons?

  • 2 years ago · Quote · #30

    AnthonyCG

    I always think of Bronstein, Keres and Spock.

  • 2 years ago · Quote · #31

    batgirl

    Dr. Spock?

  • 2 years ago · Quote · #32

    trysts

    Fezzik wrote:

    How often was Polgar in the top 3 in the world?  How often was Keres one of the top 3 in the world?


    I played through Keres, and Polgar, games. Polgar's are more dazzling to me. But, I think Polgar would have been a world champion back then.Smile

  • 2 years ago · Quote · #33

    trysts

    batgirl wrote:

    What's that got to do with washing nylons?


    Laughing

  • 2 years ago · Quote · #34

    JoseO

    Deeper Blue

  • 2 years ago · Quote · #35

    KingQueen64

    ...so then, what does washing nylons have to do with chess?

  • 2 years ago · Quote · #36

    batgirl

    you might just as well ask 'what has chess to do with washing nylons?'

  • 2 years ago · Quote · #37

    trysts

    @ Fezzik: Polgar is better than Karpov right now, if that's your criteria. I would rather make the judgement of how great a chessplayer is by playing through their games, and make an assessment based on my level of understanding in chess. I've watched threads citing rankings, ratings, and many other statistics. But to make a value judgement, on a question that requires one, the best way, in my opinion, is personal experience.

  • 2 years ago · Quote · #38

    ChristianSoldier007

    This game is s ocomplex you would not understand. Not many do, which is why the players went to a hospital for the insane instead of becoming the champion.

  • 2 years ago · Quote · #39

    excaliber1

    [COMMENT DELETED]
  • 2 years ago · Quote · #40

    excaliber1

    [COMMENT DELETED]

Back to Top

Post your reply: