17746 Players currently online!
Man vs. Machine - good luck!
Turn-based games at any time!
Vote for the best move to win!
Do you have what it takes?
Sharpen your tactical vision!
Get advice and game insights!
Learn from top players & pros!
View millions of master games!
Your virtual chess coach!
Perfect your opening moves!
Test your skills vs. computer!
Find the right private coach!
Can you solve it each day?
Bring it all together!
Beginners, start here!
Make friends & play team games!
News from the world of chess!
Search all Chess.com members!
Find local clubs & events!
Who's the best of your friends?
Read what members are saying!
I don't think you can count players who had a chance to win and didn't take it (for whatever reason) so Bronstein, Korchnoi, Tarrasch and Chigorin are all out. Keres and Rubinstein are the usual suspects, but Keres had his chances once Botvinnik was not the 'preferred' champion of the soviet authorities and couldn't take them. Rubinstein was like Ivanchuk, I think the stress of a World Championship match, even at his peak in 1912 would have been too much for him. My feeling is Maroczy would have given Lasker all he could handle in his best period 1905-1907. I don't think Nimzovitch could have beaten Alekhine in 1931, Alekhine was stratospherically good between 1930-34. Ivanchuk will eventually go down as somebody who should have been World Champion in the period with split titles but he got his shot against Ponomariev and didn't take it.
So my vote for the best player never to be WC is Maroczy.
Keres had his shot at the world championship.
Man, you're working us---right.
I wouldn't rank Maroczy as a better player than Korchnoi just because the latter lost his title matches to Karpov, the latter was a very strong opponent and Korchnoi came close to winning their first matches. When qualifying for the 1978 match Korchnoi had 5-0 after 7 games in the Candidates semi, and 5-0 after 10 games in the final. Then he was equal after 31 games in the title match against Karpov. Disqualifying him from "best player never to be WC" just because he had a chance to win the title is tough.
Maroczy had 0-13 in serious games against Lasker, Capa and Alekhine, and never won a tournament ahead of them. He didn't win any of the tournaments he played in 1906-07 but in 1905 he shared first with Janowski once and had a sole win ahead of Janowski.
Apart from everything else, Korchnoi won the game between the two :-)
what about nezhmetinov(sp??)
only the best would become world champion
Nope. The only reason he didn't manage to become WC was because of his pipe which sometimes took time to light. Burn had plus scores against Steinitz, Charousek, Pillsbury, Alekhine, etc.
He was also undefeated by Morphy, Tal, Fischer, Karpov, Kasparov, and Carlsen.
Had plenty of chances, especially against Short in 1993 but couldn't take them. If he couldn't beat Short in a match then he couldn't possibly be the 'best never to win the World Championship'..
He couldn't even get close to winning a Soviet Championship so he shouldn't be on the short list. Phenomenal attacking player though, probably even more imaginative than Tal but the positional players just blew him away.
Rubinstein, Bronstein, Korchnoi
At least everyone agrees Reshevsky deserves no respect.
pillsbury and mir sultan khan
How 'bout Hugh Hefner? I hear he's quite a player.
rubinstein,keres,korchnoi,reshevsky,bronstein,geller,gligoric,marshall,pillsbury,stein, just to name a few
by Cla_21 a few minutes ago
Smith-morra: Beating The G6 Dragon
by blackfun a few minutes ago
Best Chess Books to Read First
by cornbeefhashvili 2 minutes ago
7/28/2015 - A Delicate Process
by xray 2 minutes ago
why is ruy lopez considered the strongest
by Hatty-Freeham 3 minutes ago
Post your Chess Tables
by kenardi 3 minutes ago
Reproduction and Real Jaques of London Chess Set
by GM4U 5 minutes ago
Starting position of thematic tournaments
by RainPiper 5 minutes ago
Time Per Move
by Martin_Stahl 7 minutes ago
Should One Play Chess?
by ilikecapablanca 13 minutes ago
Why Join | Chess Topics |
Help & Support |
© 2015 Chess.com
• Chess - English
We are working hard to make Chess.com available in over 70 languages. Check back over the year as we develop the technology to add more, and we will try our best to notify you when your language is ready for translating!