10894 Players currently online!
Man vs. Machine - good luck!
Turn-based games at any time!
Vote for the best move to win!
Do you have what it takes?
Sharpen your tactical vision!
Get advice and game insights!
Learn from top players & pros!
View millions of master games!
Your virtual chess coach!
Perfect your opening moves!
Test your skills vs. computer!
Find the right private coach!
Can you solve it each day?
Bring it all together!
Beginners, start here!
Make friends & play team games!
News from the world of chess!
Search all Chess.com members!
Find local clubs & events!
Who's the best of your friends?
Read what members are saying!
Just read "End Game" about Fischer. No doubt he was one sick puppy. Inexcusable behavior.
Yet over 40 years ago, I fell in love with chess reading Fischer's column "Checkmate" in Boys' Life Magazine (the Boy Scouts magazine.) So naturally I pulled for Bobby in 1972, thinking him to be an American hero.
I find his antisemitic racism inexcusable, as well as his general ego and antiAmerican rants. But how could I name my childhood hero as my least favorite player. The guy could play chess! Lousy human being.
So apparently you do find it excusable...
Staunton for avoiding Morphy. Alekhine for avoiding a rematch with Capablanca. (could have been the other match of the century) Botvinnik for benefitting from the Russians fixing world chess. Fischer for becoming a hater and disappointing and embarrassing millions of his former fans.
For chess style, I think Petrosian is boring. Yes he was great in a way, but I much more admire the style and fighting spirit of Steinitz.
Heal Kasparov, Hurt Gelfand.
modon, that is one of the worst posts I've seen in quite some time. Let me guess, you're thinking of starting another hurt/heal thread.
I'm guessing the question here refers to famous players but I don't know any personally, however...
Some moron here at chess.com accused me of being a cheater because my online rating is way higher than all my other ratings I guess the concept of someone specializing in turn-based chess and sucking at blitz, live, etc is too much for his/her rude, obnoxious (and paranoid?) pinhead to fathom.
Also anyone who examined my games in detail will see that I've drawn and lost a fair amt of games and a fair amt of my wins were due to my opponent losing on time or playing even worse than I did - but my least favorite chess-player is above all that (or below it more likely).
Hey yeah...that is quite a discrepancy.
My favorite chess player of all time is my wife, Carol, she does not play chess very well but has other great qualities.
I dislike Aljechin for siding with the nazis and signing (or even writing?) some stupid propaganda piece stating that jews can't play chess. I read it, it is utterly illogical and thus does not befit a chess player.
An awful opportunist in my book.
I read it, is utterly illogical and thus does not befit a chess player.
Surely enough Misha Tal, for a very simple reason: I never, ever understood properly the way he was moving his men.
For the very same reason, he is also #1 on my list of the greatest players ever. Capablanca is a close second, although quite ironically, I can understand everything in Capa's play- I just cannot play like that myself...
Strangely, that makes perfect sense.
As some opponent or other of Capa once said: "You know exactly what's going to happen to you, and there's not a thing you can do about it."
My least favorite is B.O. McFarty.
He's got a lot of kin.
Anand. He just plays for draws. His games aren't interesting. I wish Gelfand had beat him.
It seems like he's got a headache all the time, anymore. I'd forgotten this was my thread.
The creator of the first chess computer. (Who i suppose were a chess-player)That computer maybe sucked, but it lead to the supercomputers of today. It made chess a little bit more boring, becouse chess is a human game and should be played and analyzed by humans.If i ever become world dictator i would forbid it.
Me!! I've dropped 200 pts in the last month or so.
Flooperpaaf, I'm glad you aren't world dictator! People should be free to write the computer programs they want, as long as they are not attacking other people's computer systems. It's freedom of speech - writing a computer program is a form of speech, just like writing a novel or a poem. And it's freedom of thought.
Computers are just a tool,it's still human on human. Why shouldn't the people who prepare themselves well have an edge? They do in all sports.
12/7/2013 - 1001 Brilliant ways to Checkmate by Reinfeld, #404
by joco134 a few minutes ago
Borislav Ivanov is BACK!
by learningthemoves a few minutes ago
by Ronald_Aprianto 3 minutes ago
by Paspasuy 3 minutes ago
0-2224 in less than three years
by socialista 4 minutes ago
by sjeffh 16 minutes ago
by ghostofmaroczy 16 minutes ago
Any good sites where I can find unlimited openings
by mattchess 17 minutes ago
How far should you expect to get after about a year of studying/playing chess?
by sammynouri 25 minutes ago
Can Anyone Become Grandmaster?
by sammynouri 33 minutes ago
Why Join | Chess Topics |
Help & Support |
© 2013 Chess.com
• Chess - English
We are working hard to make Chess.com available in over 70 languages. Check back over the year as we develop the technology to add more, and we will try our best to notify you when your language is ready for translating!