10375 Players currently online!
Man vs. Machine - good luck!
Turn-based games at any time!
Vote for the best move to win!
Do you have what it takes?
Sharpen your tactical vision!
Get advice and game insights!
Learn from top players & pros!
View millions of master games!
Your virtual chess coach!
Perfect your opening moves!
Test your skills vs. computer!
Find the right private coach!
Can you solve it each day?
Bring it all together!
Beginners, start here!
Make friends & play team games!
News from the world of chess!
Search all Chess.com members!
Find local clubs & events!
Who's the best of your friends?
Read what members are saying!
"Would Carlsen have beaten Capablanca?" by GM Gormally
What a great article, Natalia! Of course, I'd say that since GM Gormally's message is identical to the one I've been saying in other threads.
Maybe this is an insoluble question.
But I will say Carlsen because modern chess players have far more disciplined habits of preparation than they had in Capablanca's time.
Capablanca's personal chess habits were also poor. He did not prepare at all for his match against Alekhine whereas Alekhine studied all of Capablanca's games.
Physical health also matters. Capablanca did not look after himself, often indulging in late nights of wine, women and song.
So for me I say Carlsen. Chess playing strength I say =. Even take computer prep away from Carlsen. But it's personal habits and self-management that would tip it in Carlsen's favour.
Calling the Fischer the 9th best player is a joke, especially judged by someone way weaker. Nigel Short said how can we judge the moves of a 2800 player. If Nigel Short can´t do that, i dont think some GM Gormally with a peak rating of 2570 can compare the strength of FIscher to other top GMs.
I think its very presumptuous to do that, but its only my personal opinion.
Also Roman Dzindzihashvilli said for him Fischer was the strongest and i believe he knows a little more about chess than GM Gormally whos name i never ever heard before.
No need to get your knickers in a twist. It's just a journeyman GM publishing an article of his opinion, not holy tablets brought down from a mountain-top.
Calling the Fischer the 9th best player is a joke, especially judged by someone way weaker. ..
But it's ok for you to claim that Fischer was the best ever. Ok.
I am weaker than Gormally, and my judgement is Fischer is 5th best behind Kasparov, Carlsen, Kramnik, Karpov.
because Fischer was the best, not to mention Roman is of the same opinion and many other more.
But Fischer thought Morphy would whip him.
This link makes interesting reading:
It doesn't include Carlsen unfortunately, but it suggests that Capa was stronger than the other players.
However, the study also says that they dont account for the complexity of positions (Capa often went into simple positrions, where it's easier to play the best moves), so the results may be mis-leading.
1/26/2015 - Richard Teichmann vs. NN, Berlin, 1914
by yellowdart6666 a few minutes ago
White's light sq. bishop after 1.d4 and 2.c4
by hackerdentist 3 minutes ago
by Crappov 12 minutes ago
Average Ratings: OMG!
by LHB58 12 minutes ago
Sacrificing knight for 2 pawns
by hackerdentist 13 minutes ago
Please give me some advise on how to analyse your games .
by Laurenchessdiva 20 minutes ago
Setting Chesstempo for Ideal Study
by SilentKnighte5 27 minutes ago
Geraralism in chess, from general chess players.
by LazyChessPlayer3201 27 minutes ago
am i a prodigy?
by Mottley 32 minutes ago
Why does Chess.com use a fake testimonial???
by SocialPanda 34 minutes ago
Why Join | Chess Topics |
Help & Support |
© 2015 Chess.com
• Chess - English
We are working hard to make Chess.com available in over 70 languages. Check back over the year as we develop the technology to add more, and we will try our best to notify you when your language is ready for translating!