10635 Players currently online!
Man vs. Machine - good luck!
Turn-based games at any time!
Vote for the best move to win!
Do you have what it takes?
Sharpen your tactical vision!
Get advice and game insights!
Learn from top players & pros!
View millions of master games!
Your virtual chess coach!
Perfect your opening moves!
Test your skills vs. computer!
Find the right private coach!
Can you solve it each day?
Bring it all together!
Beginners, start here!
Make friends & play team games!
News from the world of chess!
Search all Chess.com members!
Find local clubs & events!
Who's the best of your friends?
Read what members are saying!
After getting so used to playing "normal" chess my brain just can't work out how to play effectively.
Wanted to shared this, from Wikipedia:
On June 19, 1996, in Buenos Aires, Argentina, Fischer announced and advocated a variant of chess named Fischerandom Chess (later known as Fischer Random Chess or Chess960) intended to ensure that a game between players is a contest between their understandings of chess, rather than their abilities to memorize opening lines or prepare opening strategies.
Fischerandom was designed to remove any advantage from the memorization of opening variations by rendering it impracticable. Fischer complained in a 2006 phoned-in call with a radio interviewer that because of the progress in openings and the memorization of opening books, the best players from history, if brought back from the dead to play today, would no longer be competitive. "Some kid of fourteen today, or even younger, could get an opening advantage against Capablanca", he said, merely because of opening-book memorization, which Fischer disdained. "Now chess is completely dead. It is all just memorization and prearrangement. It's a terrible game now. Very uncreative."Fischer heavily disparaged chess as it was currently being played at the highest levels.
If Chess is dead, what are we doing here?
We're playing Fischer Random, didn't you notice?
... "Some kid of fourteen today, or even younger, could get an opening advantage against Capablanca", he said, merely because of opening-book memorization, which Fischer disdained. "Now chess is completely dead. It is all just memorization and prearrangement. It's a terrible game now. Very uncreative." ...
Thanks much, varelse1, for this input... and vive la creativite!
Me? I'm setting up prearranged draws, to stop Fischer from advancing. Same as the rest of the world!
Yeah,here is this interview with Fischer.
Also,check out this video,called "Bobby Fischer is travelling from Japan to Iceland".In second part he starts to talk about chess and chess960 (Fischer random chess) at 03:44,and then he compares chess and chess960 for the rest of the second part of the video,and also through the whole third part of the video.
And I have to say that I completely agree with Bobby about chess and random chess.
Thank you about posting those links, marljivi. Very interesting.
It's something different...
You're welcome,TheBigDecline (and all the other viewers). ;-)
1.d4 d5 2.c4 c6 3.Nc3 e5? (4.dxe5 d4 5.Ne4 Qa5+)
by SmyslovFan 10 minutes ago
Support for conditional moves on iphone/ipad app
by mariuco 14 minutes ago
8/3/2015 - Lure And Catch
by Lady69 19 minutes ago
by Diakonia 46 minutes ago
1001-2000 worst things to do while playing chess
by IMpatzer 56 minutes ago
If Capablanca played Carlsen for the world champion match, who would win?
by jcochrane1234 58 minutes ago
Why did Fischer condemn 1. d4 ?
by JamieDelarosa 77 minutes ago
Does anyone want free chess coaching?!!
by ArchdukeShrimp 86 minutes ago
by MSC157 87 minutes ago
Will you become a CM ? ( or a NM, or a IM etc )
by btelford 102 minutes ago
Why Join | Chess Topics |
Help & Support |
© 2015 Chess.com
• Chess - English
We are working hard to make Chess.com available in over 70 languages. Check back over the year as we develop the technology to add more, and we will try our best to notify you when your language is ready for translating!