11356 Players currently online!
Man vs. Machine - good luck!
Turn-based games at any time!
Vote for the best move to win!
Do you have what it takes?
Sharpen your tactical vision!
Get advice and game insights!
Learn from top players & pros!
View millions of master games!
Your virtual chess coach!
Perfect your opening moves!
Test your skills vs. computer!
Find the right private coach!
Can you solve it each day?
Bring it all together!
Beginners, start here!
Make friends & play team games!
News from the world of chess!
Search all Chess.com members!
Find local clubs & events!
Who's the best of your friends?
Read what members are saying!
Let's make it happen, people. The time for Live Chess960 is long overdue. This topic has been on the forums for over 5 years. Where are the games? Has development even begun? Will the release go on being "immanent" for another half of a decade?
In my view, Chess960 is to the "game of kings" what black powder was to warfare. Just think of battle in medieval times! Knights-errant trained since birth; entire villages of blacksmiths; horses bred to Brobdingnagian proportions; fortresses constructed over generations - this impregnable war machine made vulnerable by the mere presence of pistols, muskets and canons. In our context, through Chess960, players that have not been afforded the many long years of training to memorize hundreds of opening variations in the standard game suddenly find themselves assailing the insurmountable.
If you please, pass this on to your friends and groups so that we can generate the longest thread possible and garner the attention this great game deserves.
Fix the current issues in Live Chess first! Adding Chess960 into the fix now will just increase the issues 3 fold and then you will the first member here wanting them take care of the same issues they are trying to solve now.
This is the first I have heard of the problems. What do you refer to?
Yes, I would like to see Chess 960 Live. Players who are excellent at Chess 960 become so by skillfully reacting to changing circumstances and unfamiliar positions. Cultivating this type of play in part short-cuts the typical route to GM-dom, which is partly the memorization of openings. So, to a degree, I agree with your gun-poweder scenario. We already have 960 in Correspondence, why not Live?
It is highly unlikely, I think, that 960 will ever overcome Standard chess in popularity since Standard has such a long (and rich) history. However, it is not just a popular venue for honing your skills for Standard. 960 is a different game. You reach positions in which you marvel at the strangeness, as if that board set-up could never be reached in Standard, which is not only possible but probable. Maybe you wouldn't want to play a 960 1-Minute Blitz. But I would love to play a 30 minute game, or a 15-10.
Chess 960 and Blitz ..... wild thing.
Actually,thats a good idea......Would love to see it
Yup i have already wrote about Live 960 in my review on Google Play chess.com app. . i wish they see it n do it. . 960 in my view is better than classic chess as it is a real test of one's tactics
AhmedRiaz: could you drop a link to that review?
I'd love to see it, and I doubt that it'd distract much from fixing any issues in the current live chess implementation.
All the pieces (pardon the pun) are there: position generation, legal move generation (special rules for 960 castling), and live chess (clocks, chat, etc).
Now, can someone glue the pieces together?
Where do I sign?
Chess 960 and Blitz together.
Thanks, ollave. And don't worry, varelse1. We are in receipt of your signature. <G>
I agree with this proposal.
I am signing on to this petition! Been waiting since 7/2011 for it! 960, in my opinion, levels the board for lower ranking players as it prohibits those who are utilizing a host of rote moves. Sometimes I can tell a person was just playing me using a predetermined set of moves based on my piece movement. Not only can one easily fall prey to this breed of player (I am too often guilty of being the victim), and subsequently become board (in both live and online gameplay), but personally I prefer to play someone who knows what the pieces are really each capable of. Just for reference, I lose these battles just as frequently, to my shame...hahaha... though I feel I glean more chess savvy from unrehearsed moves. I also appreciate the ability to apply common tactics in uncommon positions, which, let's face it-is the beauty and fun of a good ole Fischer Random Chess match.
I'm in favor of the idea. Has chess.com ever done a poll on how many people would be interested in live Chess960?
9/1/2014 - Mate in 2
by vamsikrishnaaddepali a few minutes ago
can we say caruana is stronger then carlsen now
by chessmicky 4 minutes ago
Admins: Spam alert, you may wish to check this
by adamplenty 5 minutes ago
HURT/HEAL (Top 5) Openings
by DrSpudnik 8 minutes ago
Can you really make money off chess?
by cornbeefhashvili 10 minutes ago
My System Notation
by SicilianSveshnikov 12 minutes ago
by cornbeefhashvili 19 minutes ago
Error in FIDE top 100
by Jion_Wansu 26 minutes ago
by alexm2310 27 minutes ago
blitz/bullet rating is the only thing that matters in internet chess
by Jion_Wansu 36 minutes ago
Why Join | Chess Topics |
Help & Support |
© 2014 Chess.com
• Chess - English
We are working hard to make Chess.com available in over 70 languages. Check back over the year as we develop the technology to add more, and we will try our best to notify you when your language is ready for translating!