Upgrade to Chess.com Premium!

Crisis!

Jump to forum:
 
21st September 2009, 01:01pm
#1
by ChessMastora
Beijing China
Member Since: Jan 2008
Member Points: 313

Hi.

What is your opinion about  having a 'memberships comparison table' on Wikipedia.

I object to it since it hasn't got a justified reason. Any one support it?

Go to http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chess.com

21st September 2009, 01:05pm
#2
by Scarblac
Arnhem Netherlands
Member Since: Nov 2008
Member Points: 2009

I think that discussion is better left to the entry's Discussion page.

21st September 2009, 03:53pm
#3
by ChessMastora
Beijing China
Member Since: Jan 2008
Member Points: 313

it is. I just wanted to know what other chess.com members think.

21st September 2009, 11:19pm
#4
by erik
Bay Area, CA United States
Member Since: May 2007
Member Points: 12891

just DONT get that page banned!!!!

21st September 2009, 11:38pm
#5
by kco
Perth Australia
Member Since: Jun 2008
Member Points: 23226

ok, who can remove the price comparison ? and just replaced it with the link, simple ...is it ?

22nd September 2009, 12:02am
#6
by Streptomicin
Pozarevac Serbia
Member Since: Nov 2008
Member Points: 4497

Excluding tournaments, all basic members can fully take part in other chess play.

This is not clear, free members CAN play in tournaments, that was the reason why I left all other chess sites.

22nd September 2009, 12:03am
#7
by rooperi
Gamtoos River Mouth South Africa
Member Since: Mar 2009
Member Points: 10779

I'm probaably a little slow, but I don't understand what the issue is here?

22nd September 2009, 12:05am
#8
by Streptomicin
Pozarevac Serbia
Member Since: Nov 2008
Member Points: 4497

It's not that wiki is advertising site, so they think prices, and membership details should be removed from it.

22nd September 2009, 08:33am
#9
by ChessMastora
Beijing China
Member Since: Jan 2008
Member Points: 313

It has been tagged for 'speedy deletion' already. Would someone PLEASE delete that section. I already done it a few times and this guy there insists on having the section and is threatening me.  My opinion is the same as kco.

22nd September 2009, 09:10am
#10
by AnthonyCG
Washington DC United States
Member Since: Aug 2007
Member Points: 6628

Not that I have anything against wikipedia, but the fact that anyone can do things like this is why it's not high on my list for references.

For all we know it's some guy that hates chess.com or some douche from the other sites.

It's still there 30 minutes later and it's going to be banned by admin if someone doesn't cut the table.

22nd September 2009, 09:11am
#11
by erik
Bay Area, CA United States
Member Since: May 2007
Member Points: 12891

i know who is doing it and i have let him know that it is NOT ok. i told him i would close his chess.com account if he continues to do it.

22nd September 2009, 09:27am
#12
by ChessMastora
Beijing China
Member Since: Jan 2008
Member Points: 313

Thanks! Nice Work! There would always be many opportunities to expand the article in a positive way. I'll see to that. :)

22nd September 2009, 10:02am
#13
by Nytik
Southampton United Kingdom
Member Since: May 2008
Member Points: 5828
erik wrote:

i know who is doing it and i have let him know that it is NOT ok. i told him i would close his chess.com account if he continues to do it.


Good ol' dictatorships, never let you down! Unlimited power to crush those against us... Cool

22nd September 2009, 10:12am
#14
by SukerPuncher333
Canada
Member Since: Nov 2008
Member Points: 677

What's the issue here?

22nd September 2009, 01:34pm
#15
by ChessMastora
Beijing China
Member Since: Jan 2008
Member Points: 313
SukerPuncher333 wrote:

What's the issue here?


Some person keep on putting the memberships table on the wiki article on chess.com. It cannot be accepted by Wikipedia and the article has been tagged as 'blatant advertising', which I deleted after deleting the memberships table. But now some guy keeps putting the table on.

22nd September 2009, 04:46pm
#16
by Mm40
Essex County, New Jersey United States
Member Since: Sep 2008
Member Points: 3721

I'm am a trusted user there (User:Mm40) and the membership table should NOT be there. I will do my best to salvage the article, but much of the material is ad-like and may need to be removed.

22nd September 2009, 04:57pm
#17
by TheGrobe
Calgary Canada
Member Since: Nov 2007
Member Points: 14433
ChessMastora wrote:
SukerPuncher333 wrote:

What's the issue here?


Some person keep on putting the memberships table on the wiki article on chess.com. It cannot be accepted by Wikipedia and the article has been tagged as 'blatant advertising', which I deleted after deleting the memberships table. But now some guy keeps putting the table on.


Sounds like someone needs to be banned from Wikipedia first and foremost.  I don't know how the editing privileges are handed out there, but surely there's a way to revoke them for persistent, repeat abusers such as this.

Even if it happens to be the individual Erik's identified here the recourse for Erik is really secondary to the primary issue of repeated disregard for Wikipedia's policy and unfortunately might actually cause the user to exacerbate the issue if exercised here without corresponding consequences at Wikipedia.

23rd September 2009, 10:12am
#18
by ChessMastora
Beijing China
Member Since: Jan 2008
Member Points: 313
Mm40 wrote:

I'm am a trusted user there (User:Mm40) and the membership table should NOT be there. I will do my best to salvage the article, but much of the material is ad-like and may need to be removed.


Yes, true.

 

Add your comment:

Join Chess.com for free to add your comment! Already a member? Then login now to comment.