16693 Players currently online!
Man vs. Machine - good luck!
Turn-based games at any time!
Vote for the best move to win!
Do you have what it takes?
Sharpen your tactical vision!
Get advice and game insights!
Learn from top players & pros!
View millions of master games!
Your virtual chess coach!
Perfect your opening moves!
Test your skills vs. computer!
Find the right private coach!
Can you solve it each day?
Bring it all together!
Beginners, start here!
Make friends & play team games!
News from the world of chess!
Search all Chess.com members!
Find local clubs & events!
Who's the best of your friends?
Read what members are saying!
I'm not a big fan of "Daily Chess," for two reasons. First, it makes it sound like a chore. ("Do I really need to play every day?") Second, it's not really accurate. I'm an avid Online Chess player; but I don't play every day (i.e., "daily"). I typically play minimum 3 days/move, and I often skip a day or two. I think the concept that "Daily Chess" is trying to convey is the concept of "Days-Per-Move Chess," which (as I mentioned in an earlier post) is a perfectly viable name, IMO.
It's a bit of a mothful.
That's what she...
How about inventing a new word? I like: "zock".
Says it all.
what about "cheaterchess"?
"Daily Chess" yuk !
"Digital Postal Chess" ?
chess for the undead
...said. Lol nice dog
Why is correspondence chess still not being used... Lol
That the term that I use when I blog about what I do here.
Correspondingly ...how about "Chess Restante" similar to well known correspondence usage of Post Restante?
Paul Revere Chess
Your typical online chess player:
This thread has revealed the amazing number of comedians there are in chess.com's membership. Who could have guessed it? It might not be quite so pathetic, though, if at least a few of them had any wit or cleverness at all about them. By the way, "online chess" and "turn-based chess" are truly lame designations for what is merely a computerized version of correspondence chess. Pardon me for stating the painfully obvious, but all "online chess" games played on this site are online chess; and, in all of those "turn-based games," the players always take turns making their moves. Thus, all the tortured efforts herein to imagine "creative" names simply collapse logic and common sense in upon themselves. The absurdly strenuous efforts in this thread put one in mind of the old saying: "The mountains go into labor, and are delivered of a mouse." It really takes no effort of any intellectual proportion to make the conceptual leap from postal chess to its computerized, slightly modified counterpart, all the while using the same term that would be familiar to anyone who is any kind of chess player at all, i.e., correspondence chess. Aren't there any other more useful, potentially productive things to which we can turn our attention and efforts as we try to cope with this nightmarish monstrosity which chess.com and its propellor heads suddenly foisted upon their customers? And no apologies to the propellor heads, either. In fact, I suggest they use their next vacation to visit the real world just to see it. If there is anything they are not overly burdened with, it's a sense of reality.
I agree Sooner. Why call it something it's not.
It's Correspondence Chess. None of the other given names truly represents it well. Everyone who wants to play it will play it, regardless of what you call it, so might as well stick to what it actually is. And you can add a small grey line under the title to help the casual players who don't understand the term, if Erik is still concerned about players not understanding the term. Not like 'Daily Chess' explains what it is any better or any other name dropped here. I personally don't think changing the name is going to be a marketing advantage for the above reasons given, because no new names dropped here any better explained what the games are.
To me changing the name to something like 'daily chess' or 'anytime chess' or any of the other names given, most being corny/silly names, puts the game of chess on par with the game of tiddly winks. Chess isn't that basic and we don't need to treat the players as if they are basic. We just need to help the casual players understand the term maybe. Sorry if I offended any tiddly winks players here.
what about chess4cheats?
what about chess4cheatsbecausethereisnocentaurpoolhere ?
The one thing that distinguishes correspondence chess from other forms of chess right now is the RAMPANT amount of cheating involved IMHO :) so it only seems appropriate
I can`nt activate vocation
by BayBak a few minutes ago
I can't defend to save my life.
by sammynouri 4 minutes ago
studying opening theory
by chessph 5 minutes ago
12/11/2013 - Topalov-Kramnik, Dortmund 1996
by chhatch 6 minutes ago
by DelCheMethod 8 minutes ago
Chess Books for Beginner?
by benign_man 9 minutes ago
should i consider myself lucky??
by VaishaliR 10 minutes ago
Who is better Paul Morphy or Magnus Carlsen
by HonzaZvolsky 12 minutes ago
Why place the night here in QGD
by ghostofmaroczy 12 minutes ago
What is Seblebs real rating?
by TheGreatOogieBoogie 14 minutes ago
Why Join | Chess Topics |
Help & Support |
© 2013 Chess.com
• Chess - English
We are working hard to make Chess.com available in over 70 languages. Check back over the year as we develop the technology to add more, and we will try our best to notify you when your language is ready for translating!