11747 Players currently online!
Man vs. Machine - good luck!
Turn-based games at any time!
Vote for the best move to win!
Do you have what it takes?
Sharpen your tactical vision!
Get advice and game insights!
Learn from top players & pros!
View millions of master games!
Your virtual chess coach!
Perfect your opening moves!
Test your skills vs. computer!
Find the right private coach!
Can you solve it each day?
Bring it all together!
Beginners, start here!
Make friends & play team games!
News from the world of chess!
Search all Chess.com members!
Find local clubs & events!
Who's the best of your friends?
Read what members are saying!
Correspondingly ...how about "Chess Restante" similar to well known correspondence usage of Post Restante?
Paul Revere Chess
Your typical online chess player:
This thread has revealed the amazing number of comedians there are in chess.com's membership. Who could have guessed it? It might not be quite so pathetic, though, if at least a few of them had any wit or cleverness at all about them. By the way, "online chess" and "turn-based chess" are truly lame designations for what is merely a computerized version of correspondence chess. Pardon me for stating the painfully obvious, but all "online chess" games played on this site are online chess; and, in all of those "turn-based games," the players always take turns making their moves. Thus, all the tortured efforts herein to imagine "creative" names simply collapse logic and common sense in upon themselves. The absurdly strenuous efforts in this thread put one in mind of the old saying: "The mountains go into labor, and are delivered of a mouse." It really takes no effort of any intellectual proportion to make the conceptual leap from postal chess to its computerized, slightly modified counterpart, all the while using the same term that would be familiar to anyone who is any kind of chess player at all, i.e., correspondence chess. Aren't there any other more useful, potentially productive things to which we can turn our attention and efforts as we try to cope with this nightmarish monstrosity which chess.com and its propellor heads suddenly foisted upon their customers? And no apologies to the propellor heads, either. In fact, I suggest they use their next vacation to visit the real world just to see it. If there is anything they are not overly burdened with, it's a sense of reality.
I agree Sooner. Why call it something it's not.
It's Correspondence Chess. None of the other given names truly represents it well. Everyone who wants to play it will play it, regardless of what you call it, so might as well stick to what it actually is. And you can add a small grey line under the title to help the casual players who don't understand the term, if Erik is still concerned about players not understanding the term. Not like 'Daily Chess' explains what it is any better or any other name dropped here. I personally don't think changing the name is going to be a marketing advantage for the above reasons given, because no new names dropped here any better explained what the games are.
To me changing the name to something like 'daily chess' or 'anytime chess' or any of the other names given, most being corny/silly names, puts the game of chess on par with the game of tiddly winks. Chess isn't that basic and we don't need to treat the players as if they are basic. We just need to help the casual players understand the term maybe. Sorry if I offended any tiddly winks players here.
what about chess4cheats?
what about chess4cheatsbecausethereisnocentaurpoolhere ?
The one thing that distinguishes correspondence chess from other forms of chess right now is the RAMPANT amount of cheating involved IMHO :) so it only seems appropriate
I wasn't being negative MonteChristosPawn, just stating the fact. :)
For many anyway, the ones who wouldn't cheat if there was a Centaur pool here. I concede 'some' will still use engines in the main pool and cheat even if there was a Centaur pool here and they should be banned if caught, but many will be happy to play in their own designated respected non-interfering pool, if given that opportunity. It will get them out of the main pool and everyone will be as happy as Larry.. except the die hard engine haters who would rather see them burn in hell than be allowed to play here, even if they are playing in a pool that has nothing to do with them. Personally I would never use one, never care to use one, but I know many do love them. It's obvious because we all know many use them here. :) So give them a place to play and the majority of engine users should no longer be damaging the ratings of the non engine users nor the pleasure of the game for them. :)
It's a win/win for everyone.
It is 'RAMPANT" Stampni, I agree with you. Time a solution was found.
Post #898 is the solution.
Man, at least in the cheating forum it was half-ways relevant (but still ridiculous).
Here it's just agenda pushing in a completely unrelated thread.
Am just responding to those who keep saying chess4cheats as the new name and other similar type cheating names.. I wasn't the one to bring up references to cheating in the name suggestions. ;)
Why didn't you target those people Grobe? No one is allowed to respond to such suggestions?
"Now or Later" Chess. Or maybe even "Now and Later" Chess
Only names that really suit ARE long-names..
Confidence in nonsense is a requirement for the creative process... Correspondence Chess is the only name that makes any sense, so let us call it a day on this one.
Not quite so fast.
"Correspondence" is so 19th century. The word is mostly archaic. No one even writes letters anymore. That was a cornerstone of "correspondence". And, all the postal service delivers these days is "junk mail"...no "correspondence".
We do get email. Lots of it. So, more suitable for the times: echess.
Correspondence accurately conveys chess that takes time to complete.
echess does not & will cause confusion & misconstrued selections. So bad-inferior choice.
7/28/2015 - A Delicate Process
by egoole a few minutes ago
First opening repertoire for learning purposes
by Charetter115 3 minutes ago
Sicilian Najdorf Poisoned Pawn Variation Theory
by Bishop_g5 14 minutes ago
The Bullet Chess Handbook
by tkbunny 16 minutes ago
attacking the english
by nobodicos 17 minutes ago
Reproduction and Real Jaques of London Chess Set
by strngdrvnthng 21 minutes ago
Stockfish vs Frits 140/144
by hpmobil 27 minutes ago
If Fischer would played Karpov for the World Champion, who would win?
by nimzobogo 28 minutes ago
Hurt/Heal World Top 10
by nimzobogo 34 minutes ago
Admins: Spam alert, you may wish to check this
by crazylarry77 35 minutes ago
Why Join | Chess Topics |
Help & Support |
© 2015 Chess.com
• Chess - English
We are working hard to make Chess.com available in over 70 languages. Check back over the year as we develop the technology to add more, and we will try our best to notify you when your language is ready for translating!