10378 Players currently online!
Man vs. Machine - good luck!
Turn-based games at any time!
Vote for the best move to win!
Do you have what it takes?
Sharpen your tactical vision!
Get advice and game insights!
Learn from top players & pros!
View millions of master games!
Your virtual chess coach!
Perfect your opening moves!
Test your skills vs. computer!
Find the right private coach!
Can you solve it each day?
Bring it all together!
Beginners, start here!
Make friends & play team games!
News from the world of chess!
Search all Chess.com members!
Find local clubs & events!
Who's the best of your friends?
Read what members are saying!
Actually, my zeal is for oldspeak to a certain extent, not newspeak. Perhaps "traditional speak" would be a more apt term for my meaning................
I know, Gerry, I was not referring to you... Just wanted to make a point that what should have been a simple and done discussion on whether one should adhere to the (obvious, to me at least) name "Correspondence Chess" or not, is turning into a tedious thread with an Orwellian (or Kafkaesque, if you prefer) flavour to it...
chess for the lethargic
You got that right, Hari! This thread became a verbal analogue to the carnival house of mirrors long ago and, like Boris Karloff's "The Mummy," continues ever to make its slow, laborious, senseless, but ineluctable way onward, dragging one leg along behind it all the while.
CHECK CHESS! You have to CHECK in daily to CHECK on the progress of your game, to see if your opponent worked his way out of CHECK and is only a couple of moves from putting you in CHECK mate.
Preventative is disputed.
For anyone this may apply to:
There is the bona fide condition of Histrionic Personality Disorder (section 301.50 of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of the American Psychological Association (DSM-IV).
This disorder is characterized by an excessive attention seeking behavior where the person is uncomfortable in situations when he/she/it is not the center of attention. The person consistently uses physical appearance to draw attention and also uses seductive or sexually provocative behavior inappropriately and prematurely believes relationships are intimate. The style of speech is impressionistic, lacks detail, and show a theatrical (drama-queen/king) exaggerated expression of emotion. Such a person displays shifting and shallow emotions and is easily suggestible and influenced by others or circumstances. The prognosis is guarded in the case of this disorder, due mostly to the person’s lack of insight and awareness into themselves. This is compounded by the person’s failure to face reality and recognize they are just not so special or important.
In other words, opinions are like belly-buttons, everyone has one. The oppressive need of one person to be the best is rather childish.
This sounds exactly like one of the chess.com members.
Sorry guys---you misconstrued the (mildly misquoted) cookbook (DSM) definition of Histrionic Personality Disorder. I don't know what person you're talking about, but I'm jumping in because as a psychologist, I hate seeing pseudo-psychological info being disseminated. Someone with HPD doesn't need to be "the best" or be "right" ----With HPD, the need is to be "noticed," to be looked at, listened to, sought out by others to be given more attention. The key is in the first sentence: "excessive attention-seeking behavior." That's it. The only additional inference we can add is that the person does not like "being ignored."
One more caution: as with all personality categories, there's a broad spectrum of intensity in the characteristics. You've quoted a "Disorder," which indicates a pathological degree of symptamotology. A "Histionic Personality TYPE" is just a normal variant of all the many "types" of homo sapiens you run into every day---on the street----or on a site for "Interwebs Electrochess." (sorry, couldn't resist.)
And the relevance of your comment to the issue of a suitable new name for "online chess" or "turn-based chess" would be what?
A very praiseworthy comment, motherinlaw. I commend you for it even though I do not possess the technical expertise upon which to base my praise of it. However, it was an intellectually well-balanced, sensible, thoughtfully nuanced statement. That much I can tell as a layman. It was a refreshing counterweight to ChazR's comment. And, as for relevance to the topic at hand, you covered that by offering your own suggestion for a new name, although it's not one I would ever choose. YUK! Would one have to don a Flash Gordon suit to play a game with a name like that?
"OMG!! Sooner, Did you just call my comment Irrelevant??!!!" .....(as a true histrionic would reply)..... "I Can TOtally NOT BELIEVE You Just DID That!!!"
My question is are they going to ever change it? They had that pole a while ago and Correspondance Chess won by quite a large margin, if my memory serves me well.
Correspondence Chess climbed that pole like a pro.
To capture the war-like nature of the game:
1. online chess -> siege chess
2. live chess -> skirmish chess
Blitz, of course, comes from the fast-paced war tactic called blitzkrieg. It seems to be a fairly popular way of naming chess related stuff.
When does the voting for the name end?
i agree with Daily Chess
Now try to calm down, motherinlaw. There must have been a little misunderstanding. I'm sure it was my fault, not yours. We will get you one of your anxiety pills and take you to have a little visit with your psychologist about it, and everything will be aaaaaall right, I'm sure. Okay? That's a goooood girl. LOL!
my vote is "Daily Chess". because you play with "day" time controls. second would be "Slow Chess" :)
I am voting on, "Daily Chess", as well. Sounds good, to the point, and it is a daily event for most of us, who signs on to make a move or two. Day Chess is an option, even though it doesn't sound as smooth as "daily chess".
"Daily Chess" sounds like a newspaper. Very mundane name. Quite in the mainstream of the banal. Really ho-hum.
Blocking feature not working
by Nunyanunya a few minutes ago
why is ruy lopez considered the strongest
by X_PLAYER_J_X 2 minutes ago
Geller and Tal had positive records against Fischer. Why? Explain.
by 17rileyc 3 minutes ago
How was this game not drawn?
by Ziryab 3 minutes ago
DEATH comes to chess
by uscftigerprowl 6 minutes ago
What is the best QGD variation for the club player as black?
by Username333 6 minutes ago
Is there any chance that a 1300 rated player can beat a 2700 rated player?
by DjonniDerevnja 7 minutes ago
Triple-fold Repeat Position - assistance required
by omnipaul 8 minutes ago
7/31/2015 - Slow Progression
by BryanCFB 11 minutes ago
End game draw offer.
by Chess007Guy 12 minutes ago
Why Join | Chess Topics |
Help & Support |
© 2015 Chess.com
• Chess - English
We are working hard to make Chess.com available in over 70 languages. Check back over the year as we develop the technology to add more, and we will try our best to notify you when your language is ready for translating!