11203 Players currently online!
Man vs. Machine - good luck!
Turn-based games at any time!
Vote for the best move to win!
Do you have what it takes?
Sharpen your tactical vision!
Get advice and game insights!
Learn from top players & pros!
View millions of master games!
Your virtual chess coach!
Perfect your opening moves!
Test your skills vs. computer!
Find the right private coach!
Can you solve it each day?
Bring it all together!
Beginners, start here!
Make friends & play team games!
News from the world of chess!
Search all Chess.com members!
Find local clubs & events!
Who's the best of your friends?
Read what members are saying!
What bothers me most about groups is people joining who don't "belong". For example when I joined the Georgia ( USA state ) group I was expecting all the members to be either from Georgia or living currently in Georgia and have found people there who arent even from the USA and some have never even been to the USA nor Georgia....... I have found the same problem in the USA Southeast group, one particular member isnt even an American and is also a member of another USA group......
If you can solve that problem, you'll become rich beyond the dreams of avarice.
"Everybody wants to be an American."
Karl_ wrote: But isn't this up to the Supers to enforce these things? Seems to me they can delete anyone from the group they wish to. If they want a private, resticted group then it is up to them to make it so.
How do you propose weed out non-Americans from the USA Southwest group? Set up a House Committee on un-American Activities?
Maybe I should join this group, but I don't speak American, hmmm....
Yeh, it's like joining the cool boys and girls group. I wanted to join, but deep in my heart I know I'm not cool (enough). But if I was (cool enough), I would become an admin and the first thing I would do is start deleting those people who were not as cool as they think they are. I would delete and delete until I was the only cool one left.
So what is the use/point of having "groups" then if a "group" can be just one ?!
H O G W A S H
To be able to set up vote chess games versus an individual?
A perfectly good reason. Another is that in the great majority of cases a group represents a concept rather than an individual person.
Q-What would be the purpose for removing all one person groups? What would we gain?
"Q-What would be the purpose for removing all one person groups? What would we gain?"
Reb could save a few euros on HOGWASH, those 40 gallon drums are not cheap.
Have you ever been stalked or harassed by a Chess.com member?
by BasterdSonOfTal a few minutes ago
Ponziani: Impractical in non-computer Correspondence Chess?
by kantifields a few minutes ago
Carlson vs Capablanca
by Chessattackman 11 minutes ago
Chess tactics for beginners
by TheKingofShame 11 minutes ago
Chess and IQ (intelligence)
by Akatsuki64 12 minutes ago
Help needed! The tactical grob
by CosmicGypsy 15 minutes ago
Europe Respects Chess More Than USA?
by mrhjornevik 19 minutes ago
Ratings Are Deceiving
by Zigwurst 24 minutes ago
by I_Am_Second 37 minutes ago
I need an opening against 1. e4
by SilentKnighte5 42 minutes ago
Why Join | Chess Topics |
Help & Support |
© 2014 Chess.com
• Chess - English
We are working hard to make Chess.com available in over 70 languages. Check back over the year as we develop the technology to add more, and we will try our best to notify you when your language is ready for translating!