12330 Players currently online!
Man vs. Machine - good luck!
Turn-based games at any time!
Vote for the best move to win!
Do you have what it takes?
Sharpen your tactical vision!
Get advice and game insights!
Learn from top players & pros!
View millions of master games!
Your virtual chess coach!
Perfect your opening moves!
Test your skills vs. computer!
Find the right private coach!
Can you solve it each day?
Bring it all together!
Beginners, start here!
Make friends & play team games!
News from the world of chess!
Search all Chess.com members!
Find local clubs & events!
Who's the best of your friends?
Read what members are saying!
I noticed on the homepage that there are 5,199,018 members. I have only ever seen about 5,500 online at any given time and I realized that there must be over 1,000,000 accounts that have been created and abandoned. I know that time zones differ and the number of players online rises at certain times of day, but over 5 million seems like a big number.
There are only about 300,000 games logged and it would seem to me that it would take 600,000 players at 1 game for every 2 players to make that number. That is not even 1 million players!
I get the feeling that the number is wrong and reflects all accounts, even those that have not been accessed in over 3 years like a friend of mines. It feels like fraud to me to make the site seem more popular than it is. I am not saying that the staff is plotting to make the site more popular, I just think that the numbers are ridiculous.
I won't respond to ride or pointless trolling comments.
I tend to agree, if say 2 000 000 people have used their accounts once or twice a few years ago and have not returned since, I think it is fair to consider those accounts to not be members, but abandoned accounts/non-members.
I would also bet that there are more than a few "members" who are simply duplicate accounts, and that there should be a formula that might guestimate the percentage of accounts from the same IP adress that are indeed duplicates and remove those from the "membership" numbers as well.
Who cares? They can probably sell more advertising which is fine with me. I want the people that run this site to make money and make it the best chess site they can for the people that do play.
On a side note: I'm happy to see that the Republicans of chess.com has only 9 members.
How is the number of 'members' relevant to our experience on this site? Whether there is 100,000 or 100,000,000 how is this important?
I was just noticing something that didn't really make sense. If you just want to be rude, you can find some other thread.
Tao999, that is exactly what I was thinking.
Well annotated (from a strategic perspective) Car Kann, London, Slav games.
by binblaster a few minutes ago
6/19/2013 - Short and Sweet
by EthanKogan999 a few minutes ago
Debate: What to call "Online Chess"...
by Stigmatisert a few minutes ago
My dragon got slayed!
by caveatcanis 3 minutes ago
Inspirational Adult Improvers
by ih8sens 3 minutes ago
naka is stronger then magnus
by gimmewuchagot 6 minutes ago
Really Bad Sportsmanship in Real Tournaments
by speedster265 6 minutes ago
by bastiaan 7 minutes ago
Do I play like a computer?
by Daniel90 9 minutes ago
The old Tactics Trainer timer debate
by owltuna 10 minutes ago
Why Join | Chess Topics |
Help & Support |
© 2013 Chess.com