11622 Players currently online!
Man vs. Machine - good luck!
Turn-based games at any time!
Vote for the best move to win!
Do you have what it takes?
Sharpen your tactical vision!
Get advice and game insights!
Learn from top players & pros!
View millions of master games!
Your virtual chess coach!
Perfect your opening moves!
Test your skills vs. computer!
Find the right private coach!
Can you solve it each day?
Bring it all together!
Beginners, start here!
Make friends & play team games!
News from the world of chess!
Search all Chess.com members!
Find local clubs & events!
Who's the best of your friends?
Read what members are saying!
How can I be "maxed out" on Computer Analysis if I have "unlimited" use of it? OK, I realize there is only so much software that can be dedicated to a member's computer-analyzed games, but I don't even see what the limit of my "unlimited" use is. 100 games? 50 games at once? I don't know. Please help?
perhaps chess.com has some kind of "fair use" policy, so "unlimited" is actually limited.
I'm tracking this to see if you'll get your answer.
Good question, mine is simpler:how do I get one of my game analysed? I cannot see anywhere on my screen where I can do that. I am talking about the one which is free per week. Thanks.
Go to any completed game of yours,
and click on the link that says Computer Analysis.
It's 100 games.
When I signed up for diamond, I too recall seeing that I had "unlimited computer analysis", but looking through an FAQ, I saw that it's 100 games for diamond.
here's the link:
well, this link (advertisement) says unlimited:
Looks like the membership page needs to be updated, if the KB article is correct.
100 games per week. OK, I accept that, and I still think it's worth the diamond membership price. But yeah, the ads should be changed, because right now it's just false advertising to say "unlimited access to all features," etc.
Are Chess.Com in breach of contract?
Yes they are, but the remedy is unclear.
Is a "Breach of Contract" breaking the law. I know in New Zealand it is.
No, it is a civil matter between the parties to the contract
magnus and nakamura- my thoughts
by bb_gum234 a few minutes ago
Carlsen and the quest for 2900
by MSC157 2 minutes ago
4/27/2015 - Minor Assault
by thechesschanakya 2 minutes ago
Facebook group disliking a chess site
by Litwitlou 3 minutes ago
Characterizing Rating Levels
by madhacker 8 minutes ago
by prashanth222000 10 minutes ago
Help with analysis please!
by corum 24 minutes ago
How do I
by corum 29 minutes ago
Vote for the worst move in the History of Chess
by JamieDelarosa 34 minutes ago
How to stop ::redacted for name and shame:: from spamming the tactics trainer?
by You_haxored_me 41 minutes ago
Why Join | Chess Topics |
Help & Support |
© 2015 Chess.com
• Chess - English
We are working hard to make Chess.com available in over 70 languages. Check back over the year as we develop the technology to add more, and we will try our best to notify you when your language is ready for translating!