5972 Players currently online!
Man vs. Machine - good luck!
Turn-based games at any time!
Vote for the best move to win!
Do you have what it takes?
Sharpen your tactical vision!
Get advice and game insights!
Learn from top players & pros!
View millions of master games!
Your virtual chess coach!
Perfect your opening moves!
Test your skills vs. computer!
Find the right private coach!
Can you solve it each day?
Bring it all together!
Beginners, start here!
Make friends & play team games!
News from the world of chess!
Search all Chess.com members!
Find local clubs & events!
Who's the best of your friends?
Read what members are saying!
eBusiness
I wonder, when you challenge someone to a match with a random sides, why does the result of the random draw display before the game has been accepted? It is confusing, and gives players the option of being selective in what matches they accept.
Could this be changed?
phyxius
It doesn't bother me, I'll play what ever comes up
theshrike
Same here.
TheMoonwalker
But I agree.. it should be changed
It's not something big to me either, but principally it is just downright wrong, and it couldn't take a lot of time to fix.
jhuschstp
I don't understand what effect this could have...what's the point exactly?
If you only want to play white you can simply choose to accept only challenges where the draw is in your favor.
eddiewsox
You have to know that you will gain rating points if you draw a much higher rated opponent and lose points if you draw a much lower rated opponent, so what is the difference between knowing exactly how many points are at stake for a draw than for a win or a loss?
Draw as in "drawing straws", not draw as in "drawn game".
Saccadic
Probably shouldnt have used the word 'draw' then - i had to read everything twice.
I can't find a better word, I have now tried to make it a bit more clear.
I see, you mean that you should have to accept a random seek without knowing if you are Black or White. This is a good idea in theory, but players could still aboort games before 4 moves are made if they didn't want the color, so you would have to change the abort feature as well. Sometimes players abort games because they don't want the opponent.
Oh I get it now. Yeah I guess that's a problem. But I guess if people only want to play as white, they'll find a way. It's their loss that they don't get to experience the other half of game play.
carpman
I'm as bad with white as I am with black. So I don't care. Not a bad idea though.
Of course cheating or misconducting is possible on so many levels anyway. But this system is really an invitation to bad behaviour. When you recieve an invitation to a game you never see random colours, you are forced to know if you will have the white pieces or not before you make the choise of playing the game or not. Even if you try to ignore it, it is going to bias your decision in some way.
Reading messages from banned members
by MindWalk a few minutes ago
5/26/2012 - Ragozin - Veresov, Moscow 1945
by saminslc a few minutes ago
chessblood (white) vs. ChristianSoldier007 (black) WITH KIBITZERS!
by alexlaw 15 minutes ago
Chess on Kindle
by AlexNic 17 minutes ago
What is the best ereader for pdf chess books?
by AlexNic 20 minutes ago
Can tournament points get you anything on chess.com?
by Chessdude007 21 minutes ago
Tactics Trainer (Time Zone issue)
by AlexNic 23 minutes ago
FREE COACHING!!!!
by wmlee2010 24 minutes ago
Mate in 5 (MEDIUM)
by pralhad1056 28 minutes ago
Use of a copmuter for advice!
by finity 34 minutes ago