5972 Players currently online!
Man vs. Machine - good luck!
Turn-based games at any time!
Vote for the best move to win!
Do you have what it takes?
Sharpen your tactical vision!
Get advice and game insights!
Learn from top players & pros!
View millions of master games!
Your virtual chess coach!
Perfect your opening moves!
Test your skills vs. computer!
Find the right private coach!
Can you solve it each day?
Bring it all together!
Beginners, start here!
Make friends & play team games!
News from the world of chess!
Search all Chess.com members!
Find local clubs & events!
Who's the best of your friends?
Read what members are saying!
chesaholic
recently read kurt vonnegut's 'Mother Night' ..and my 'ego' dropped more points then my any loss in chess..wow..life is not to be overcome but sustained .. live chess at no more then 5 min. rating should not be far from correspondence 'online' rating ..otherwise i will suspect cheeting..any thougths on this?
jpd303
i have a major difference between the two and i swear i dont cheat. ive been disconected many times on live chess and lost points and im useually playing poker simultaniously when i play live so my attention is split. my online i pay attention to everything ican and try not to move without a plan, where as in live ill move because it looks good not because of any planning
and vonnegut rules
Kupov
lol CC chess ratings are generally inflated 200-600 points from Live or OTB ratings.
Have fun suspecting 90% of chess.com of cheating though.
John_sixkiller1
I think that most everybody has higher ratings with online chess. It probably just means that it is the tougher cookies that play live chess.
Torkil
I don't know Vonnegut, but as to the rating difference, mine is about 500 points in favour of correspondence. Yes, I have experienced some disconnects, but that's not the reason. Rather you can say I totally suck at blitz, while I like to believe that I am rather good at analysing a given position deeply when provided with enough time.
Certainly I despise the option of using computer assistance.
And yes, online chess ratings do seem to be inflated.
right now my online is an outrageous 1725 and i truly do no think im anywhere that good of a player, but ive been beating 1800's and such so against THIS population i guess i am that "good"
I'm sad to say that your live ratiing of 1400 is probably much more accurate :(
oh im sure kurpov, i dont have any delusions of great playing. ive been a C class player for years now and im fine with that. ive scalped a few 1600's USCF rated but mostly they stomp me. im just tickled to death, i think i just topped 1740 online!
NabeelDaWizard
I need to know one thing ............... while trading online you dont get disconnected even for a tiny moment but playing live chess makes you lose points because of DISCONNECTION (reasons not known).......... why? Live chess Server seems to have some technical disturbance which needs to be resolved on priority basis.
So you find that your live and USCF ratings are very comparable?
edgy_rhinx
In online chess one can use position board tool wich allows any weakling to thoughtfully compute variations twelve-fifteen moves ahead. Without this tool they are toasts.
AfafBouardi
I saw Vonnegut speak a few years back...quite charming even at that age. If I remember correctly he has a chess story with using humans as pieces in Welcome to the Monkey House.
osd1
I think the never ending debate about CC rating versus anything else is a bit like comparing apples and oranges. My CC rating lies in the 1700's so I know if I play someone else with a similar rating it will probably be a rather even game. Sometimes I drift into the 1800's and I feel this is inflated. I've always wanted to play CC because I'm only interested in the problem of chess not the social life, history,etc. All a rating does is give you a comparison of skill under a set of conditions, nothing else.
i find my live play and USCF strength are about equal...my OFFICIAL uscf rating was 910 but i havent played a tourny since '97 (my last tournament I tied 2nd-9th [7th on tie breaks] in the Wv scolastic championships, i only lost to the guy that placed first Mike Spencer USCF 1666), and i only participated in i think 10 all together with abyssmal results the first year i played...but anyway, when i left tournament chess i was beating 1300's no problem, 1400's were about even, 1500's id win one occasionally and 1600's stomped me often so im a solid C class player and my live rating here reflects that
Aye, from what I have observed the live ratings can be extremely accurate.
PeterNorth
My rating is inching its way upward.
pushwood
Cheeting? If I play fast does that make me a cheetah?
thanks for correction, pushwood..'cheating'.. for my defence i did not cheat and run thru check-spelling program to up my spellllling rating in English..My native language is not English but there is no excuse for disconnect here... To continue this discussion I found a of dostoevsky-kupov remark more accurate..by the the way..you can see all games played..and dis-connect or no disconnect you can see clearly how the person plays via live chess much better then online chess... Great players like Tal , being sick as he was later in his life won blitz wold championship in Canada..all, and I mean ALL players at master level are as good in speed games as they are in otb play...and the best 'correspodence' players are not even in the top 200 FIDE rating
Reading messages from banned members
by MindWalk a few minutes ago
5/26/2012 - Ragozin - Veresov, Moscow 1945
by saminslc a few minutes ago
chessblood (white) vs. ChristianSoldier007 (black) WITH KIBITZERS!
by alexlaw 16 minutes ago
Chess on Kindle
by AlexNic 17 minutes ago
What is the best ereader for pdf chess books?
by AlexNic 20 minutes ago
Can tournament points get you anything on chess.com?
by Chessdude007 21 minutes ago
Tactics Trainer (Time Zone issue)
by AlexNic 23 minutes ago
FREE COACHING!!!!
by wmlee2010 24 minutes ago
Mate in 5 (MEDIUM)
by pralhad1056 28 minutes ago
Use of a copmuter for advice!
by finity 34 minutes ago