13940 Players currently online!
Man vs. Machine - good luck!
Turn-based games at any time!
Vote for the best move to win!
Do you have what it takes?
Sharpen your tactical vision!
Get advice and game insights!
Learn from top players & pros!
View millions of master games!
Your virtual chess coach!
Perfect your opening moves!
Test your skills vs. computer!
Find the right private coach!
Can you solve it each day?
Bring it all together!
Beginners, start here!
Make friends & play team games!
News from the world of chess!
Search all Chess.com members!
Find local clubs & events!
Who's the best of your friends?
Read what members are saying!
This is getting entertaining. Now you're starting to contradict yourself. First you criticise my grammar with "You could talk better," and now you're saying "Of course your grammar of your home language is better than mine."? So whatever argument you're trying to make about grammar is invalid at this point. Also, how did you come to the conclusion that I'm a racist? And that I lack education? That doesn't make any sense either, and even if it did, it wouldn't at all correlate to why I avoid rematches in bullet chess. And I'm not sure what you're trying to point out with that last try. So gg.
When i said "talk better" i referred to the impoliteness you showed.Till now you said things like,"Because people who want rematches are generally arrogant idiots like you.","Go ride a tricycle or something" without answering anything of what i wrote about the subject of rematching in bullet.You stuck with my "superiority" and other bullshit.
And we get it "bud",YOU DONT REMATCH.Okay.
I'm not obligated to be polite to anyone, especially arrogant people like you. I mean it's not like you're being super polite either by posting this thread in the first place. And in my very first post I told you why most people don't like to rematch, so again, not sure what you're talking about. Mouse-slips and time losses when up material are also part of the game and besides, no one should have to be called disrespectful by people like you (pretty ironic) just because they don't want to rematch. I'm just defending like-minded players.
jsph_stin, when you say that accept a rematch is a kind of respect, it means that decline it is not respectful. So I had to say not-respectful instead of unrespectful but why is accept respectful?
In my opinion,giving your opponent a second chance,if he requests it,is some kind of respect.You respect his will of a second game.To "take his blood back".That is all.And by playing more than one games,is a better criterio of the difference or not of two players.In science one is none.
By saying that you're also implying that it's always disrespectful to decline a rematch request in online bullet.
Yeah this is exactly why I think he's arrogant. By saying that it's disrespectful to ever decline a rematch, you are saying that since you personally do accept rematch requests, you are better than everyone who doesn't by referring to them as "running idiots". And lmfao, just look at his name. Joseph Stalin. Communist dictator. Case closed.
"Joseph Stalin. Communist dictator. Case closed."I am not suprised.I already know what kind of history you are being taught.I am sure you know that socialism is the worse system ever existed in the world and USSR was a bunch of criminals who accidentally beat Nazis.Hahaha.Since we could figure out if playing a rematch in bullet is hard,this conversation is hopeless with you "bud"
Nope. The opponent has the chance, yet it is lost. So why give another one? By playing one more game is a waste of time.
Even in a friendly match, there is no rematch. The loser admits that he/she loses.
Stalin so strongly believed that he and Hitler had an understanding that he refused to listen to his military advisors' warnings in 1941 that the Wehrmacht was massing for an attack, and purged any one who dared utter such blasphemy. As a result, when the attack came, the Soviet army was completely unprepared and suffered horrible defeats, while Stalin spent the first several days after the attack holed up in his office in shock.
Anyway you're a joke and you don't know how to hold your own in a simple argument so I don't feel obligated to talk to you anymore. See ya.
It is a discusion that cant be done here.This is for sure.And what seems to be "indepentant" its not.
Saved by the bell. Oh and indepentant isn't a word.
not if you were white. white has an advantage and for a truely fair match each should have the opportunity to play white.
Rematch - no rematch - why do we see these complaints? The opponent didn't want to play another game for whatever reason. So what? Go play another game with someone else.
play another thousand games and you'll understand...it has to do with losing to another player with a much higher rating than yourself.
Don't understand that - if your response was directed at my post. I've got almost 700 live games on this site, but I don't see how that matters.
Are you complaining because you play black and you lose? My stat shows I play slightly worse (6-8%) with black. But I still win more than 50% with black.
If you lose, you lose. Don't blame it on your luck.
People that get paired automatically to play with you are agreeing to play one game with you, they are not agreeing to a scientifically conducted test to determine "who is the best player".
Most players only want rematchs when they lose, and they keep asking for rematches until they win once, and then... they leave.
To "take his blood back".
You don't have any right to demand "your blood back". That is the crux of every "rematcher" thread. You want people to be forced to accept your terms, because people that believe rematchs are some God-given right are narcissists that cannot concieve that other people have things to do in their life besides satisfying your random urges. It's not about you. Hard to believe, I know.
They beat you, and probably don't even care, while your insides are churning at the loss. This is called "insecurity", and is something you'll get over someday when you realize that losing a chess game does not emasculate you. Take your losses like everyone else, and move on.
If you don't like losing and cannot handle it without gnashing your teeth, may I suggest you don't play chess ;).
proper ettiquette if you beat someone in bullett is to say 'OWNED,' then close the window before they can respond back
And then you can make a youtube video.
Don't understand why everyone is crazy over rematches just do it later
What is chess good for?
by billfurlow a few minutes ago
Bobby Fischer vs Magnus Carlsen
by SmyslovFan 4 minutes ago
8/29/2014 - Rada - Kostal, Prague 1942
by damongross 23 minutes ago
Hurt/Heal World Champions
by thecentipede 25 minutes ago
News Flash!! Sarcasm gets you banned.
by kleelof 29 minutes ago
My Best Games
by Meet_Your_Sensei 34 minutes ago
is Weinstein more paranoid than fischer
by knightkrawlirr 51 minutes ago
Sinquefield Cup 2014
by pfren 59 minutes ago
by bulletplayer2004 84 minutes ago
PLEASE VOTE: 30/30, 30/15 or 30/10 in Version 3
by Empathy1 87 minutes ago
Why Join | Chess Topics |
Help & Support |
© 2014 Chess.com
• Chess - English
We are working hard to make Chess.com available in over 70 languages. Check back over the year as we develop the technology to add more, and we will try our best to notify you when your language is ready for translating!