12516 Players currently online!
Man vs. Machine - good luck!
Turn-based games at any time!
Vote for the best move to win!
Do you have what it takes?
Sharpen your tactical vision!
Get advice and game insights!
Learn from top players & pros!
View millions of master games!
Your virtual chess coach!
Perfect your opening moves!
Test your skills vs. computer!
Find the right private coach!
Can you solve it each day?
Bring it all together!
Beginners, start here!
Make friends & play team games!
News from the world of chess!
Search all Chess.com members!
Find local clubs & events!
Who's the best of your friends?
Read what members are saying!
I get two things out of this:
1). It is rude to drag out a lost game, then resign immediately before checkmate.
2.) If a game is hopelessly lost, it is rude to drag it out to checkmate.
I'm not sure I agree totally with number 1. While I wouldn't intentionally drag out a lost game, if I or my opponent was caught by suprise, I would not consider it rude to resign when mate is imminent. I fact, I'd consider it an acknowledgement that the winner had played well.
Generally, that's the way I take a resignation - and the way I intend it to be taken when I resign - Congradulations to my opponent.
Like others, I will play out a lost game hoping my opponent makes a mistake. However, once it is obviously not going to happen, I think it rude not to resign. For example, I would consider it rude to force an opponent to play out a took (only) ending - unless I felt he might not manage it. On the other hand, a bishop and knight ending I'd play out unless I was sure my opponent could manage it.
Somewhat off topic - are comments rude? It seems to me gennerally not , but not sure.
I have generally the same view, but I feel that especially during bullet and blitz games, or even non-top rated OTB tournament games, it is not considered rude to drag out a game simply because of being down significant material (eg 5 points). In many middle game positions, a "lost" situation may be very dynamic such that one or two tactics later the situation is improved or reversed. Perhaps only to play out the most optimal continuation and observe if the tides shift. I believe that chess sportsmanship also includes fighting for a comeback and holding on to the last chance (as in a possbility of certain advantages in areas such as tempo or piece coordination). I view the ability to draw as also an art. (Get it?)@RHWoodcock Anyways, I wasn't too sure what do you by comments? Comments made by the opponent during a game? Would you like to clarify?
Sometimes I resign, sometimes I don't. But everytime I resign (even if K+R vs K) I feel like I should have played the game out till the end.
It's not about that particular game. It's about getting into an habit at least at my level. Why would I want to ever think of resigning. It's stupid to expect my opponents to do so. I don't mind opponents hoping for a stalemate as long as they don't take unnecessarily long between moves.
Everytime I haven't resigned in a hopeless situation I have played better in subsequent games.
I currently have a "stalled" game, one move from checkmate, with a queen and an about to be promoted pawn which will provide the mating move. My path to mate has been clear for 5 moves. I intentionally sacrificed a rook for his last pawn some 10 moves ago, leaving me with 4 pawns on opposite sides of the board, and my opponent with no power pieces or pawns - expecting a quick finish by resignation or otherwise. I'm now in the third day of waiting for his last move in a game that took less than a week for the first 50 moves. THAT'S RUDE.
I've decided it would be equally rude to tell him so.
I'm not a novice (in years of play), but have never played a tournament - but understand that conversation in such play would be unnacceptable, and perhaps grounds for disqualification.
Here, however, I would suspect that "good move" or even "where are you from" or "how long have you been playing" probably would be fine during a game. Of course, I would not consider it rude if I recieved no reply. Also, a running commentary would be arrogant and distracting, so some discretion is certainly necessary. I'd play and comment, here, much as I would with a friend in an over-the-board game.
But, I'm wondering if others see it the same way?
Play at faster time controls and save yourself a tidal wave of keystrokes. Very Simple.
Always resign with your pinky raised.
But tidal waves of keystrokes are so pretty!
How did Magnus Carlsen defeated Garry Kasparov at age 13?
by user2468 5 minutes ago
How many farmers have reached master level?
by SenpaiOfDoom 10 minutes ago
Mid Game Analysis
by baddogno 10 minutes ago
Is there any chance that a 1300 rated player can beat a 2700 rated player?
by Colin20G 13 minutes ago
Bobby Fischer or Magnus Carlsen
by GreedyPawnEater 13 minutes ago
How to get titles like FM, IM, NM, GM
by GreedyPawnEater 17 minutes ago
Idea to dramatically raise number of paying members FAST
by blasterdragon 18 minutes ago
why is ruy lopez considered the strongest
by Fiveofswords 19 minutes ago
I will gift a Diamond Membership to 1st person to solve this!
by blasterdragon 21 minutes ago
Yugoslav attack vs the Pirc?
by poucin 24 minutes ago
Why Join | Chess Topics |
Help & Support |
© 2015 Chess.com
• Chess - English
We are working hard to make Chess.com available in over 70 languages. Check back over the year as we develop the technology to add more, and we will try our best to notify you when your language is ready for translating!