Upgrade to Chess.com Premium!

sore LOOSERS


  • 3 years ago · Quote · #1

    tabatha

    WHATS WITH ALL THE PLUMS THAT LET THE TIME RUN OUT WHEN THEY ARE LOOSING ? IYS ONLY A GAME.

  • 3 years ago · Quote · #2

    iEpicFail

    Right, it's only a game and there's no point in getting mad over how your oponet choses to finish.

  • 3 years ago · Quote · #3

    SeitelJN

    Yes just a game, but what is irritating is when you're in a tournament, you're one move from mating your opponent so he stalls the match for a day and a half and when he gets down to a half hour left on his clock, he decides to use some of his vacation time to further prolong the inevitable.

  • 3 years ago · Quote · #4

    mosqutip

    Yeah real problems with those loosers. Goin' around, making things less tight.

  • 3 years ago · Quote · #5

    Ninshikou

    Sounds like you got amazing opponents who wants to show you the art of patience.

    Have a nice day.

  • 3 years ago · Quote · #6

    SeitelJN

    Ninshikou wrote:

    Sounds like you got amazing opponents who wants to show you the art of patience.

    Have a nice day.


    LOL.

  • 3 years ago · Quote · #7

    Practicality

    I keep hearing this complaint. Why not just let the time run out? Go read some articles a while.

  • 3 years ago · Quote · #8

    Eli

    Practicality wrote:

    I keep hearing this complaint. Why not just let the time run out? Go read some articles a while.


    Sometimes they make a move at the last moment in hopes that you arn't paying attention and will lose on time.

  • 3 years ago · Quote · #9

    tabatha

    iEpicFail wrote:

    Right, it's only a game and there's no point in getting mad over how your oponet choses to finish.


     whos mad I am just discussing the topic .INTERESTING.is that your style?

  • 3 years ago · Quote · #10

    tabatha

    SeitelJN wrote:
    Ninshikou wrote:

    Sounds like you got amazing opponents who wants to show you the art of patience.

    Have a nice day.


    LOL.


     I thought patience was a virtue not an art ! you learn somthing new every day . Thanks

  • 3 years ago · Quote · #11

    rovingeye

    spell check..losers not loosers

  • 3 years ago · Quote · #12

    iEpicFail

    tabatha wrote:
    iEpicFail wrote:

    Right, it's only a game and there's no point in getting mad over how your oponet choses to finish.


     whos mad I am just discussing the topic .INTERESTING.is that your style?


    Who? Well from the pure caps post I assumed you were. Actually, my "style" is making bad moves with no over all strategy, while losing very quickly.

  • 3 years ago · Quote · #13

    Elona

    Practicality wrote:

    I keep hearing this complaint. Why not just let the time run out? Go read some articles a while.


     BINGO was his name-o!

  • 3 years ago · Quote · #14

    HotFlow

    "I keep hearing this complaint. Why not just let the time run out? Go read some articles a while."

    As strange as it may seem some individuals come to this site purely to play chess.  Reading articles would entail doing something they didn't come here to do. 

  • 3 years ago · Quote · #15

    KingPan

    Practicality wrote:

    I keep hearing this complaint. Why not just let the time run out? Go read some articles a while.


    stalling is unsportsmanship like

  • 3 years ago · Quote · #16

    CRShelton

    While you wait, you could practise bringing your spelling up to a third grade standard.

    When you start the game, you agree to the time constraints.  If they aren't to your liking, don't start the game.  If your opponent is abusing the vacation time, you can report it. 

    Or you can waste your time posting stupid complaints in the forum about something that nobody has any control over except for you.  Correspondence chess is not a game for the impatient.

  • 3 years ago · Quote · #17

    bcguy390

    you guys need to stop over reacting about what someone chooses to do on their time. If its a forced mate, just stick it in the conditional moves and get along with your life.

  • 3 years ago · Quote · #19

    MM78

    Zug wrote:

    To rovingeye...

    Spell checkers will not catch the bad spelling of "looser" for "loser" as both are legitimate words.

    This is one of the most common misspellings among chess players who never bothered to pay attention to their elementary school education.  For those whose native language is not English, well, they get a pass.

    - Zug


     on a pedantic note the spell check will actually pick up both "loosers" and "loosing"


Back to Top

Post your reply: