Precisely Captain !
Super Admin critical feature needed
Sort:
hmmmmmm ... perhaps THAT'S y chess.com took it away cuz SA's wr abuse'n it? didn't think of that but i could c the potential of ppl's voices & opinions b'n suppressed & forums b'n manipulated2only reflect those whom agree w/SA, etc. now that i think about it, not sure if it's gd2hv or not. on1hand, SA's should hv full control over his/her group; however, i don't believe in individually eliminating specific voices bc of their difference of opinion either. so i guess so long as the option2report a troll2chess.com is still available4them2remove individual posts w/o sacrificing the entire forum, then i guess i'm not c'n2big a problem. duza group belong2the SA? or duz it belong2the members? do the members represent the SA? or duz the SA represent his/her members?
Interesting point of view ..... ((((( fumbling for the eject button))))
lol
.
Sounds like someone has control issues.
But then again I've never run a group so maybe this is actually important.
Such an option could be used in "control freak" type of way. The option, however, could also be used to maintain "kid appropriate" forums and weed out the trolls.