Here is a list of all the titled players at www.chess.com

There are 38 players who say they are titled.

20 of them have never played a game at www.chess.com

Of the 18 who have, only 12 seem to be active.

Of the 12 active, titled players, only 6 are rated above 2200 here.

 

Name	Handle	FIDE	USCF	chess.com
Belgrade	Belgrade	2354	0	1969
Blalock, Rex	Reb	2240	2223	2334
Cobblepot, Ozzie	ozzie_c_cobblepot	0	2200	2110
Colding, Ernest	cldng	2203	2220	2237
Costantini, Roberto	thinkdifferenet	2289	0	0
Davies, Nigel	NigelD	2477	0	0
Dembo, Yelena	YelenaDembo	2464	0	2482
Doroftei, Nicolae	doron50ro	2263	0	0
Gavrikov, Viktor	Gavrikov	2513	0	0
Gil, Javier	Chessnia	2455	0	0
Ginsburg, Mark	Nezhmet	2365	2404	0
Goletiani, Rusudan	RusudanGoletiani	2383	2384	2533
Gourlay, Iain	IainG	2371	0	0
Igornikus	Igornikus	2340	2368	0
Khmelnitsky, Igor	IgorKhmelnitsky	2479	0	0
Kwartler, Lonnie	GreenLaser	2232	2225	0
Lilov, Valeri	TigerLilov	2385	0	0
loser	loser	0	2200	0
Milanovic, Vojislav	vojislavmilanovic	2308	0	0
Monteban, Martijn	monty82	2276	0	2042
Mont-Reynaud, Jordy	jordy	2200	2250	1153
Okrucinski, Tadeusz	tao7	2281	0	2177
Paolo	paolodm	2334	2414	2120
Perunovic, Miodrag	TheButcher	2420	0	0
Petersen, Mike	Zug	0	2207	2334
Phelps, Lee	enpaussante	0	2286	1687
Phillips, Rene	TheChessGym	0	2200	1937
Pruess, David	dpruess	2425	2457	0
Rakhmanov, Aleksandr	Rakhmanator	2508	0	2260
Rendle, Thomas	Trendle	2397	0	1950
Roghani, Arash	alex1927	2373	0	1752
Schiller, Eric	FM_Eric_Schiller	2174	2200	2015
Tindall, Brett	Brett-T	2239	0	0
tonydal	tonydal	0	2200	0
Turzo, Attila	attilaturzo	2331	0	1503
Vovk, Yuri	vovkcoach	2549	0	0
West, James	JimWest	2219	2213	0
zoramp	zoramp	2400	0	0

 

Very interesting, some of these.  

Some of them are not titled players.

dalmatinac wrote: Some of them are not titled players.

---

What do you consider as "titled" ?  Only GMs ?  Or perhaps only fide titles and not national titles ?

No,it was my mistake I thought on all players on chess.com which put that they are titled players.I didn't see at all Bill's list.

I'm pretty sure this Nigel Davies guy is a fraud. He is supposedly rated 2477, but he hasn't even won a game here.

It is not ok Mathijs,blame somebody without proofs.You know for many titled players online chess sites can be very attractive because of getting new pupils and earning money.

mathijs wrote: I'm pretty sure this Nigel Davies guy is a fraud. He is supposedly rated 2477, but he hasn't even won a game here.

---

How many games has he played here ? I dont see a game history for him at all.

mathijs wrote: I'm pretty sure this Nigel Davies guy is a fraud. He is supposedly rated 2477, but he hasn't even won a game here.

---

 I think he's on the level.  Perhaps he just doesn't like to play with us patzers.  We might make him worse! 

mathijs wrote: I'm pretty sure this Nigel Davies guy is a fraud. He is supposedly rated 2477, but he hasn't even won a game here.

---

 Kinda hard to win a game when he's never played one. But, I would say that he is at least very close if not winning in a game against the entire site, so, there is that.

What I wanted to say is that "titled" players on chess.com,which put only NM,FM,IM or GM without name and surname,picture.I think chess.com should simply delete them.

Remove from titled players.

dalmatinac wrote: What I wanted to say is that "titled" players on chess.com,which put only NM,FM,IM or GM without name and surname,picture.I think chess.com should simply delete them.

---

And who are you to decide chess.com policy where titled players are concerned? I believe titled players are required to provide "proof" to chess.com that they are titled. They arent required to prove anything to you nor to other members of chess.com.

You are arrogant reb.

Fight, fight!!!!!

dalmatinac wrote: You are arrogant reb.

---

How very "Christian" of you ! How am I the one who is arrogant when it is you that think you have something to do with chess.com policy? How am I the arrogant one when its you who feel titled players need to prove to you that they are titled? 

Baseballfan wrote: mathijs wrote: I'm pretty sure this Nigel Davies guy is a fraud. He is supposedly rated 2477, but he hasn't even won a game here.

---

 Kinda hard to win a game when he's never played one. But, I would say that he is at least very close if not winning in a game against the entire site, so, there is that.

---

 Yes, Im pretty sure he is not a fraud. Though its strange how titled playes have a chess.com rating like 1150 or 1500, It could be a computer/otb thing I don't know.

dalmatinac wrote: You are arrogant reb.

---

How very "Christian" of you ! How am I the one who is arrogant when it is you that think you have something to do with chess.com policy? How am I the arrogant one when its you who feel titled players need to prove to you that they are titled? 

 

I didn't say all titled players but some need.And is fault to be honest?

And this haven't nothing with religion,reb why you are so angry man?

 

   dalmatinac and Reb.

You boys take it outside.  We don't want you wreckin the place!