After I finish an unrated game with a very low rated opponent, it brings down my average opponent's rating. What gives? That's obviously silly.
It only affects your average opponent's rating, not your actual rating. The average opponent is merely a guide to people looking up your previous record as to the general level of person you have played against. The total games played by you also includes your unrated games, so the average is like for like. In any event the average of opponents is a relatively meaningless statistic, as many highly rated players play rated and unrated games against weaker opponents who challenge them because they are polite people prepared to help others improve their game.
You can get too obsessed with statistics. Leave that to the baseball and cricket nuts.
Yelena Dembo is probably the strongest player on this site, and her average opponent rating is 1449, because she is prepared to play a range of weaker players who want to learn.
Perhaps it might be useful to show averages for rated games as well as for all games, though I fail to see the point, as your own rating takes the relative strengths of opponents in rated games into account.
Join Chess.com for free to add your comment! Already a member? Then login now to comment.
But how much do you know about the game - the history, the players, the rules, and more!? Take our quiz and compare your scores!
Mark all forum topics as READ