9970 Players currently online!
Man vs. Machine - good luck!
Turn-based games at any time!
Vote for the best move to win!
Do you have what it takes?
Sharpen your tactical vision!
Get advice and game insights!
Learn from top players & pros!
View millions of master games!
Your virtual chess coach!
Perfect your opening moves!
Test your skills vs. computer!
Find the right private coach!
Can you solve it each day?
Bring it all together!
Beginners, start here!
Make friends & play team games!
News from the world of chess!
Search all Chess.com members!
Find local clubs & events!
Who's the best of your friends?
Read what members are saying!
This is why I will no longer play unrated players. I start a game with an "unrated" player thinking they are new to the site. Offer my "welcome" and whatnot just to get smoked by someone who is now rated 1500+ after 25 moves. WTF?
And I don't buy it that a 2000+ FIDE rated player is just now coming back to the game... PLEASE!
Now before anyone berates me as a poor sport keep in mind that I enjoy a good game and don't mind losing (just look at my list of losses) but this tactic seems a little underhanded in my book.
Anyone else run into this? Other than not playing unrated players is there any defense for this behaviour?
If they beat you, they should (initially) get a rating higher than yours. Please bear in mind that the uncertainty of their rating is very large, and if they lose the next game their rating will fall dramatically.
May be the real rate for the unrated equal +2100 or +2200 :) and then the 1500 player is weak for him :) but the player who deserve 2100 rate is still unrated because he is new in the site :)
I started a turn based game not too long ago with a player rated roughly even to me (Maybe a little below, I don't remember the exact numbers). As the game progressed, his rating climbed and climbed until he was 400 or so points above me. I realized I was out classed. At first I thought, "This sucks." But it turned out to be a very enjoyable game. I ended up resigning, but I think I played a pretty good game, considering. Hopefully, I learned something.I would hardly call this an underhanded tactic. The simple fact is, when a player is new to the site, you have no idea how good they are until they finish some games. If it really bothers you though, when you initiate a seek, you can specify that an opponent has played a minimum number of games so you can be a little more sure of their rating. I'm talking about turn-based, I don't know about Live Chess.On the other hand, this could be a solution for the people who post complaints about not being able to get games with higher rated opponents. Play against unrated players. You might get lucky.
Hi. The solution would be to show the Rating Dispersion (RD) that actually it is calculated by chess.com in the Glicko rating system it uses. The higher the RD means the more unrealiable the rating of the player is. Looking at recent games can also roughly show you if your opponent rating is rather accurate or not. With about 10 games in recent past the RD is siginificantly less than the 350 points initial value. Games a year ago does not really count to lower the RD, so you know. Cheers.
I've played with others where this has occured. There are also some good people who only concentated on live chess and they stumbled upon and are now enjoying turn-based.
There is also an issue with certain people such as myself having a broken computer.
I went from around 1800 to 1380 or so after timing out around 70 games or something. Thanks to an online tournament, being the BAKU London System, it jumped back up to a 1750 and a random 1400 won 18.5/20 in their first round.
Amen; I lost close to 30 points on a game from a "sandbagger". I always
submit I want to play a "rated" player but sometimes you get an "unrated".
Sometimes I just abort the game before it starts.
strength attainable without theory
by Diakonia 3 minutes ago
KG accepted question
by Fiveofswords 4 minutes ago
Why do Sicilian players hate 2.c3?
by Fiveofswords 10 minutes ago
A quick analysis anyone?
by Charetter115 12 minutes ago
an italian repertoire for players under 1200
by SKh94 15 minutes ago
When a coward refuses to resign.......
by Meet_Your_Sensei 16 minutes ago
YOUR IQ compared to" World Chess Champion" Garry Kasparov ..
by bobbyDK 17 minutes ago
The King Is An Attacking Piece Even In The Middlegame.
by chessmicky 30 minutes ago
I have News!
by bobbyDK 33 minutes ago
Who Is The Best Players In Chess History
by papitala 43 minutes ago
Why Join | Chess Topics |
Help & Support |
© 2015 Chess.com
• Chess - English
We are working hard to make Chess.com available in over 70 languages. Check back over the year as we develop the technology to add more, and we will try our best to notify you when your language is ready for translating!