1. It's boring.
What Characterizes a Normal Chess.com Thread?
Sort:
2. it's spam.
3. It is probably about an opining
4. It is dealing with chess players, most likely Carlsen
It's definitley either A. A troll thread
or B. Had enough trolls post that it turns into a troll thread
The1899Club wrote:
2. A surfeit of pretentious yet undereducated louts attempting to seem intelligent.
3. Many that think they are witty and thus doing a service to the website in general by posting their inane drivel.
lol, spot on!
manspider29 wrote:
It's definitley either A. A troll thread
or B. Had enough trolls post that it turns into a troll thread
for some of them yes
1899Club really posted the best characteristic
chessdex wrote:
1899Club really posted the best characteristic
No! I have to do better than him! How about this:
There's a good chance that it was created by either chessdex or GeorgeBlackChess.
well, got to agree with you all, but, just 0.0001% of the time it is half-decent, and actually improves the forum. I bolded and italicized the 0.0001% of the time so that it would be understood by the dolts who troll here.
Macer ,sure, maybe, you still have to do a little better
EDB123 wrote:
well, got to agree with you all, but, just 0.0001% of the time it is half-decent, and actually improves the forum. I bolded and italicized the 0.0001% of the time so that it would be understood by the dolts who troll here.
good one
What characterizes normal?
well, thank you. I am happy to add. Which part did you like? I can do more of each after all.
913Glorax12 wrote:
What characterizes normal?
average, modt likely to occur
What is average?
EDB123 wrote:
well, thank you. I am happy to add. Which part did you like? I can do more of each after all.
I liked the 0.0001% it is half decent
913Glorax12 wrote:
What is average?
most likely to occur
Hi all! I just wanted to here opinions about the question I'm asking, what characterizes a normal chess.com thread? Just an average thread that you are most likely to see. Opinions?