What feature would get you to pay for a membership.

Jump to forum:
« Previous | 1 2 | Next » | Last Post
22nd March 2009, 08:25am
#1
by joetheplumber
The White House United States
Member Since: Nov 2008
Member Points: 305

I got an email from Chess.com today it asked me why a membership isnt worth it. This is one of my oppinions. Add your own. I know how hard everyone here works, adding features all of the time. But I think these suggestions should be taken more seriously than in other discussions because this is a true example of what would make more money for Chess.com

Here is my reply to their email:

"Many of the member features are slightly inaccessible on this site and offered free on other sites. For instance, Opening Explorer can be found free on 365chess.com. Its the same as yours, so why should I pay to use it. However, if the game explorer was linked to my actual games, so i could open the current position with one click, i would consider this a feature worth paying for.

Thanks, joetheplumber"

22nd March 2009, 12:51pm
#2
by o-blade-o
Algiers Algeria
Member Since: Jan 2009
Member Points: 474

Membership helps the players to raise their levels

22nd March 2009, 01:14pm
#3
by SkpVwls
United States
Member Since: Jan 2009
Member Points: 254

One member feature that I would like to have is the one with tournaments. (More player capacity, more options, ability to host more, ect.) Anyway, I can't become a member because I'm too young. No credit card, no job. Innocent

22nd March 2009, 01:31pm
#4
by RainbowRising
United Kingdom
Member Since: Oct 2008
Member Points: 3079

No lag would get me to join, but I guess that's impossible.

No idiots, but that won't happen either.

As Costelus mentioned, those features as good - I am considering membership over the summer when I have more free time. Maybe you could do a 3 month membership  package Eric?

22nd March 2009, 01:46pm
#5
by aansel
Long Island United States
Member Since: Dec 2008
Member Points: 689

While I like this site, it really has little to offer me that i don't already have. I prefer to play Blitz on ICC (better competition), my slow play is through ICCF and CCLA--the quality of player is higher.

The forums here are OK but many are dominated by silly (and repetitive threads). My feeling is most members here are not super serious about chess and are lower level players which is great as people should enjoy and learn the game but it offers little to me.

Tactics Trainer is fun and I use my three free tries a day but I have many tactical tools. Chess Mentor is a good program I have the DVD's but really not what I use to train.

So the answer in my mind is what value ifor my use does premium membership offer and my answer is little--even though I like the site.

I have played in one tournament so far which was fun but clearly it will take a long time for the next rounf as there is WAY too much vacation time allowed --also I notice people here play way too many games at once which also is not great for their game (or playing against them)--just my own personal thoughts and not a knock on the site at all.

23rd March 2009, 02:29am
#6
by PerfectGent
St Andrews Scotland
Member Since: Feb 2008
Member Points: 1722

you mean you want MORE than you already are offerd???

23rd March 2009, 02:39am
#7
by farbror
Uppsala Sweden
Member Since: May 2007
Member Points: 2420

Videos, GM simuls, interactive lessons/lectures, World Peace....

23rd March 2009, 03:56am
#8
by NM Reb
Lisbon Portugal
Member Since: Sep 2007
Member Points: 4220
SkpVwls wrote:

One member feature that I would like to have is the one with tournaments. (More player capacity, more options, ability to host more, ect.) Anyway, I can't become a member because I'm too young. No credit card, no job.


 You are too young to do "odd jobs" ?  Hmmmm......

23rd March 2009, 04:19am
#9
by lazyb
bucharest Romania
Member Since: Dec 2008
Member Points: 16

I wanted to purchase a membership last week for openings explorer, but i wasn't too happy of the features i will get. maybe they should revise them, or not. Although the fee was not high, the single one that made sense to me was the higher, but it wasn't too attractive also. 

Anyway, i will continue to play for free.

23rd March 2009, 04:44am
#10
by LokiMundane
South Caroline United States
Member Since: May 2008
Member Points: 192

I look forward to supporting this site. I think Erik has done a fantastic job at building this site and listening to his users. All the great features of the site aside I think that a certain level of commitment to the community in which you serve should be rewarded regardless.

Plus, the fees are incredibly reasonable.

23rd March 2009, 04:49am
#11
by thegab03
on the road to nowhere! Ireland
Member Since: Nov 2007
Member Points: 19112

I got the good owl gold star to get away from the publicty, the tactics trainer, I never use, it would be good if I could over that to someone that would apreaciate it, eh?

23rd March 2009, 05:07am
#12
by Baseballfan
Durham, North Carolina United States
Member Since: Feb 2008
Member Points: 1872
RainbowRising wrote:

No lag would get me to join, but I guess that's impossible.

No idiots, but that won't happen either.

As Costelus mentioned, those features as good - I am considering membership over the summer when I have more free time. Maybe you could do a 3 month membership  package Eric?


We don't have a 3 month package per se, but you can certaily purchase a membership monthly, and stop it after three months.

23rd March 2009, 05:14am
#13
by RainbowRising
United Kingdom
Member Since: Oct 2008
Member Points: 3079

Yeah I realised that Baseballfan!! Lol. I just meant that people might be more inclinded to buy a 3 month package if it has a small discount. My thinking was you appear (and I use that very losely) to have missed the niche market that is students. There is no way I will buy a membership for a year because it will be yet another distraction to stuyding. Given that I have 3-4 months off in the summer, I'd be more inclinded to buy a membership then, which is why I suggested coming up with some sort of 3-4 month package xD

23rd March 2009, 05:22am
#14
by victhestick
Batavia, IL United States
Member Since: Sep 2008
Member Points: 1721

     to me membership was a way of saying thank you for developing

          a great site.

     the perks and features are icing on the cake

23rd March 2009, 05:32am
#15
by purcellneil
New Jersey United States
Member Since: Oct 2008
Member Points: 93

aansel

I hope you don't mind a question.  I thought your comments were helpful, especially the comparisons with other sites, but it made me wonder -- since these other sites are better from your perspective than Chess.com, why are you here?  I'm not suggesting you leave, only interested in hearing what it is that you like enough about the site to make it worth your time to be here.  I only ask because I am not familiar with the other sites you mention, and am less serious a chess player than you are - so I value your opinion.  Would you be willing to discuss what you like about this site?

Thanks,

Neil 

23rd March 2009, 09:43am
#16
by joetheplumber
The White House United States
Member Since: Nov 2008
Member Points: 305

purcellneil, i will answer that questionas it applies to me.

I like the slow chess here, and the great community that it is built around. The players are not so good here, so i fit in better. Its a user friendly site, but I find the memberships to include features I dont need and not those that I do. Why am I still here if its not what I want, because nobody does better, its a personal matter, but I dont think that there is a single chess site online worth paying for. Im hopng a couple of membership benifits will be changed and that I can take advantage of those.

23rd March 2009, 10:00am
#17
by purcellneil
New Jersey United States
Member Since: Oct 2008
Member Points: 93

Thanks, Joe.  I like the community here too - and I like playing slower games too (allows me to play a little when I have time and come back later).  I wasn't really challenging you or aansel (to whom my question was directed) - I just wanted to understand what he liked about the site (given that his comments made it seem like other sites were generally better).  Just curious, and particularly interested because he seems to be deeper into chess than I am.

Neil

23rd March 2009, 10:02am
#18
by purcellneil
New Jersey United States
Member Since: Oct 2008
Member Points: 93

As for myself - I pay for a membership mainly to be able to use the Chess Mentor whenever and as much as I like.  I'm in too many games right now to have time for it though...

23rd March 2009, 10:14am
#19
by virax
Kalamazoo United States
Member Since: Jun 2008
Member Points: 62

I paid for a membership before they changed the subscription types, and was effectively downgraded. Needless to say I will not be renewing my subscription.

23rd March 2009, 10:17am
#20
by animalcontrol
SO*CAL United States
Member Since: Apr 2008
Member Points: 61

WORLD PEACE.

« Previous | 1 2 | Next » | Last Post

Add your comment:

Join Chess.com for free to add your comment! Already a member? Then login now to comment.