What is it with all those people who do action a? The only possible reason people a is r. r is ridiculous, therefore people to whom r applies are all n. I, for one, do not a. In fact, I don't see how anyone can be such an n as to r enough to a. I think that something oughta be done about all of these aing ns, as they are completely messing up everything. Of course, because I think a is wrong, then so does everyone else, and I shall therefore receive sympathy and my logic must be flawless.

Please post my your opinions.

And just to be sure I'm not beaten to the punch, here is a generic limerick to accompany the generic complaint;

There once was an X from place B,
Who satisfied predicate P,
The X did thing A,
In a specified way,
Resulting in circumstance C.

Nice limerick.

I prefer the one that begins: "There once was a fellow named Carter"

                                                  r=republican?

But some people could also a because of t, and t isn't so bad.  In fact, although I'm sure some ns t, not everyone who ts is an n.  I may be being a bit of a k here, but I'd even go as far as to say that some people who t might even be bs.

What are you, a p?

a * r = n

r = n/a

a = n/r

I hope this clears things up.

 Lol that depends what a p is. 

Give me more letters. 

Also, n/ar = 1

I love dat limerick 'p'

It makes it so easy to 'c'

Why this site's worth the price

People here are so nice

Chess.com is the chess place to 'b'

I happen to like doing a,

and do it almost everyday.

Don't call me an n,

for that doth offend,

I'm really one heck of a j !

?

I'm going to do it all!

a

b

c

d

e

f

g

h

i

j

k

l

m

n

o

p

q

r

s

t

u

v

w

x

y

z

Flawless you are : )))

I once saw a horse ( with no name ) that was hungry , it was an mtgg .

This topic may not be appropriate for the forums, maybe you should contact staff directly about this one.

Very nice. Maybe Chess.com could set up a template so that people can just use the template to submit a post about one of the standard complaints.

The titles of the posts could just be:

a="say gg", r="gloat", n="arrogant and rude"
a="not resign", r="draw out lost position", n="annoying"
...

And then we could just scan the forum post titles and not have to open the threads.

I think we all have WAY too much time on our hands!

F***