10377 Players currently online!
Man vs. Machine - good luck!
Turn-based games at any time!
Vote for the best move to win!
Do you have what it takes?
Sharpen your tactical vision!
Get advice and game insights!
Learn from top players & pros!
View millions of master games!
Your virtual chess coach!
Perfect your opening moves!
Test your skills vs. computer!
Find the right private coach!
Can you solve it each day?
Bring it all together!
Beginners, start here!
Make friends & play team games!
News from the world of chess!
Search all Chess.com members!
Find local clubs & events!
Who's the best of your friends?
Read what members are saying!
This refers to Live Chess.
I think no need to say how annoying is this when you lose in the game only because you were disconnected. I understand that connection problem is difficult to solve as this may be beyond of the site control - it can be dropped on a client side.
But why do we need to rely on connection so much? Why not to make it possible to resume the game after connection was restored? All games are saved in database anyway because we can see them in the history. So it should not be a big deal to allow to resume the game if connection was dropped for a small period of time.
I think the best solution would be to not award a win for a dropped connection, but instead to save the game at its position and allow 24 hours for the disconnected player to request a game continuation with the other player. This would at least give them some chance to resume their game if fate intervenes.
I think steevmartuns suggestion dooes make sense.
I agree with steevmartuns. This happened in one of my live games where I was in a very strong position and also up by a complete rook, and then I dropped connection and counted as a loss which made me quite mad.
I agree. This would make it so people can't cut their connection so it won't count as a loss, while allowing the legit players to play on. I think this idea should be put into effect for Live Chess.
I think the problem with a disconnection is a player may simply "disconnect themselves" to gain more thinking time.
So may be could treat a disconnection like an "adjournment". Each player would be allowed one adjournment that they can request during he game. A disconnection could be treated as an immediate "request" for an adjournment of say 24 hours.
If a player is unlucky and is disconnected again they then lose on time.
Erik already designed a solution for us:
For some reason it has not been deployed yet... hopefully soon. I can't take live chess seriously as long as brief disconnections due to no fault of your own lose ratings points even when you have plenty of time left on your clock.
Raibutai> I suppose this system was put in so people wouldn't be able too just close their browser window to avoid losing a game.
See Erik's proposal. There are solutions not prone to abuse, such as continuing to run the disconnected player's clock when they're away. Judge for yourself how well his third proposal balances the need to avoid abuse with the need not to arbitrarily lose games.
I think my adjournment idea is a simple solution.
I wont be playing any more live chess on chess.com until disconnection issue is sorted. Being disconnected when you're winning or have the advantage is too annoying! Until then I will only now play correspondence chess.
I believe this was tried about 1 month ago but it didn't work out because people were using it to gain time.I hope they come up with a long-term solution that can be used soon.
I would be happy with someone suddenly gaining extra time by getting an adjournment, if it gives the insurance that if suddenly disconnected (once) would not lose the game. I think of this "adjournment" here as similar to the adjournment that happens or used to happen in world chess championships after games at move 40.
I agree with this be rearranging a time where both players are on becomes difficult.
I think there should be a short period of time to regain the connection, like 2/3 minutes. If the connection isn't regained then, then there is a chance of it being intentional. Even if it wasn't, it'd cut the number of incidents down dramatically which would satsify users of the site more than the current method.
8/3/2015 - Lure And Catch
by gavogadro 4 minutes ago
can magnus carlson cross the 3000 elo barrier
by Herebrocker 5 minutes ago
In The Doldrums -- Again ?
by RonaldJosephCote 11 minutes ago
Will you become a CM ? ( or a NM, or a IM etc )
by cabadenwurt 26 minutes ago
Hurt/Heal Top Non-World Champions
by Monarch1066 29 minutes ago
how exactly does the castling work?
by stuzzicadenti 30 minutes ago
Does anyone want free chess coaching?!!
by macer75 31 minutes ago
Reproduction and Real Jaques of London Chess Set
by UpcountryRain 37 minutes ago
1001-2000 worst things to do while playing chess
by luke623 38 minutes ago
1.d4 d5 2.c4 c6 3.Nc3 e5? (4.dxe5 d4 5.Ne4 Qa5+)
by pfren 44 minutes ago
Why Join | Chess Topics |
Help & Support |
© 2015 Chess.com
• Chess - English
We are working hard to make Chess.com available in over 70 languages. Check back over the year as we develop the technology to add more, and we will try our best to notify you when your language is ready for translating!