12025 Players currently online!
Man vs. Machine - good luck!
Turn-based games at any time!
Vote for the best move to win!
Do you have what it takes?
Sharpen your tactical vision!
Get advice and game insights!
Learn from top players & pros!
View millions of master games!
Your virtual chess coach!
Perfect your opening moves!
Test your skills vs. computer!
Find the right private coach!
Can you solve it each day?
Bring it all together!
Beginners, start here!
Make friends & play team games!
News from the world of chess!
Search all Chess.com members!
Find local clubs & events!
Who's the best of your friends?
Read what members are saying!
easy to fall into the stalemate trap with Rxh7 instead of d7+. A good lesson to always be on the look out for an accidental stalemate.
Good to solve.It has also another many many way......................
You almost expected it to be an exclusively Queening problem. ie. converting a pawn to a Queen. But they stopped us just short of the promotion.
This may not be efficient . . . but at least you get to promote two pawns
thanks for your way not to promote a pawn with Q,and someones correct method,was able to solve,rule of thumb,lesson from bill indirectly,thanks1,Kc6...Rh7,2.pd7+...Rd73.Rh8,as far as puzzle went but to mate.3.Rh8...Rd8,4. Rd8#
Il faut savoir donner pour assurer le gain... bonne journée.
I've played several endgames like this. Two interesting checkmates - One with two pawns and one with a king and a rook (with a pawn for protection). Saw it right away.
Damn easy problem. Black is trying for a draw. Don't take the rook it would be stalemate.
would K move to Kb7,Kd7,on second move,he has a choice,or would Kd7 leed to # quicker,or stop pawn promotion?
Shows the power of pawns. I must be getting a bit better, I saw this one.
There are many ways to win this position [as far as I can see, any move of the rook on the 6th rank will do it, maybe even any move ]. 1. Kc6 is only the most efficient manner.
After a closer look, it really looks like even 1. d7? is clinching it.
nice stratogy,but how many people would have solved your way.mate in 4 is alot more efficient
@ paulified22: I just tried to show that even the worst move in the position (1.d7????) is winning. And by the way, I really wonder how many people found the mate in 4 directly. I first found 1.Rg6 as a winning option. Since "my" move was not accepted, I tried harder and only then found 1.Kc6 which I had first rejected because of 1. ...Rxh7
For such a position, it would be good to indicate "mate in 4", because, as already mentioned, any white move wins.
Not a good one Though.
Only a 40 year break...
by ielosubmarine a few minutes ago
7/25/2014 - Sahovic - Karolyi 1986
by dufferps 11 minutes ago
kicked from livechess
by evTourniquet 17 minutes ago
Ruth Haring: 'Girls are bad at chess'
by kleelof 36 minutes ago
YOUR IQ compared to" World Chess Champion" Garry Kasparov ..
by Optimissed 40 minutes ago
Ponziani: Impractical in non-computer Correspondence Chess?
by kantifields 40 minutes ago
Post Your Jokes Here!
by AnishBhargava 51 minutes ago
7/24/2014 - Mate in 5
by keyakku 57 minutes ago
I Don't See the Point of the Touch-Move Rule
by Optimissed 62 minutes ago
by melvinbluestone 63 minutes ago
Why Join | Chess Topics |
Help & Support |
© 2014 Chess.com
• Chess - English
We are working hard to make Chess.com available in over 70 languages. Check back over the year as we develop the technology to add more, and we will try our best to notify you when your language is ready for translating!