Your Games Analyzed W/ GM Magesh Panchanathan on Chess.com/TV is LIVE & OPEN to ALL MEMBERS! Click here to watch!
Upgrade to Chess.com Premium!

11/2/2011 - Mate in 4


  • 19 months ago · Quote · #21

    Zhanhui1995

    easy

  • 19 months ago · Quote · #22

    Timeyo_R_Nkosi

    K

  • 19 months ago · Quote · #23

    Jakeandalfie

    The last move had to be thought through

  • 19 months ago · Quote · #24

    deepak21071974

    hmm:)

  • 19 months ago · Quote · #25

    KumarAnkur

    this could be easliy mated in third attemt, "Mate in four is justified".

  • 19 months ago · Quote · #26

    Ashish--Sharma

       ASHISH SHARMA

  • 19 months ago · Quote · #27

    mohandisusa

    the king has no defence at all...

  • 19 months ago · Quote · #28

    Blue7647

    Very nice

  • 19 months ago · Quote · #29

    gibbson

    wuwut!

  • 19 months ago · Quote · #30

    Pavrey

    nice puzzle to solve

  • 19 months ago · Quote · #31

    chirilloff

    nice...

  • 19 months ago · Quote · #32

    LORYGRA

    i can't believe... i could resolve it! it means that it must be quite easyTongue out

  • 19 months ago · Quote · #33

    jadou25

    too easy

  • 19 months ago · Quote · #34

    wyh2013

    easy but needs thinking a little

  • 19 months ago · Quote · #35

    K911

    Enjoyed that one.........................Wink

  • 19 months ago · Quote · #36

    hucca

    At first considering moves just like in real game i checked out the if the queen sac works. A bit stunned it didnt I started calculating rook sacrifices and indeed there was a double check pattern..rest is history.

  • 19 months ago · Quote · #37

    Baldeagle1

    The first two moves seemed obvious but couldn't see the solution until I made these first two moves.  Took a while to see the pawn charge would work.

  • 19 months ago · Quote · #38

    JCE77

    easy

  • 19 months ago · Quote · #39

    tadbir1

    It is a good puzzle.

  • 19 months ago · Quote · #40

    Blunderific

    Extremely natural.


Back to Top

Post your reply: