12198 Players currently online!
Man vs. Machine - good luck!
Turn-based games at any time!
Vote for the best move to win!
Do you have what it takes?
Sharpen your tactical vision!
Get advice and game insights!
Learn from top players & pros!
View millions of master games!
Your virtual chess coach!
Perfect your opening moves!
Test your skills vs. computer!
Find the right private coach!
Can you solve it each day?
Bring it all together!
Beginners, start here!
Make friends & play team games!
News from the world of chess!
Search all Chess.com members!
Find local clubs & events!
Who's the best of your friends?
Read what members are saying!
Wouldn't it be more easy if we do this?
It might be if it wasn't for the black bishop on h3.
Couldn't have said it better mySZ.elf!
To easy for me.
It doesn't make sense, why didn't the king just take the rook in the first place?
This would take a lot of analysis to show that there isn't a faster way.
i don't understand!
why not Ae6+ ?
help me, it's a mate in 2 for me
the bishop on h3 can capture.
After a quick visual calculation and I haven't read all the posts yet, I think quick mating combinational because White's knight is covering c7-square is with 1.Qxd8 Kxd8 2.Rd1+ and now one variation would be...Bd6 (better is...Bd7 variations but White still has good chances) 3.Rxd6+ Kc8 4.Re8#
what's wrong with:
1. Be6+ Qd7 (forced)
@bartolomio mind the bisshop on h3
Waiting for Sunday.
interesting,took a blunder to make it work
bartimolo, its not mate because there is a bishop on h3 that captures your white bishop
fAR TOO COMPLICATED FOR ME !!
This is certainly a neat puzzle. I enjoyed it. It did take several tries for me,and at least for me, was not obvious. Although if I was playing black on move 5 I would have captured the Rook on d7 instead of moving to c8, which the King did eventually. Unless I missed or overlooked something, I think he could have done so. That threw me off. I am sure there is a reason the King did not do so on move 5, I just don't see it at this time. I will have to look again. Anyone know?
Not suspicious if high correspondence rating but low blitz rating
by PaulEChess a few minutes ago
4/24/2015 - Setting Them Up For Failure
by Electrodynamix360 a few minutes ago
Good chess books with no chess in them?
by batgirl a few minutes ago
I caught a student of mine cheating--how do I close the account?
by shakedaspear a few minutes ago
beccoming a staff member.
by kleelof 5 minutes ago
how does carlsen win every game do you know the answer
by chessmaster54458 8 minutes ago
Annoying players at chess.com
by kleelof 9 minutes ago
Question about chess OTB cheating
by latvianlover 21 minutes ago
by joliepa 27 minutes ago
Evil alexxchess person
by kleelof 32 minutes ago
Why Join | Chess Topics |
Help & Support |
© 2015 Chess.com
• Chess - English
We are working hard to make Chess.com available in over 70 languages. Check back over the year as we develop the technology to add more, and we will try our best to notify you when your language is ready for translating!