Upgrade to Chess.com Premium!

1/16/2013 - Mate in 4


  • 20 months ago · Quote · #61

    Tiagonr

    Nice and not very easy, i just did it after 1 mistake.

    I wich more problems like this...

  • 20 months ago · Quote · #62

    chesspeterd

    [COMMENT DELETED]
  • 20 months ago · Quote · #63

    Djazbin

    Good day; bonne journée.

  • 20 months ago · Quote · #64

    Pawncracker1

    that puzzle was kind of easy...

  • 20 months ago · Quote · #65

    eddysallin

                              Of course the 5 move smorther mate would be more pleasing......but in 4 what can u do?

  • 20 months ago · Quote · #66

    Pawncracker1

    had trouble with the first move....                                                                                                                                                                                      

  • 20 months ago · Quote · #67

    Pawncracker1

    ......but the last three were easy

  • 20 months ago · Quote · #68

    stephen_33

    I went for the standard smothered mate in 5 moves as well.  Shows you should never stop thinking    Wink

  • 20 months ago · Quote · #69

    altinyzeiri

    You have solved this problem!
    4. Qd8#
  • 20 months ago · Quote · #70

    lichuyang

    good

  • 20 months ago · Quote · #71

    kaichess

    no bad

  • 20 months ago · Quote · #72

    lichuyang

    nice

  • 20 months ago · Quote · #73

    CLIMBINGBIRD

    4 moves is just the shortest way, there are a few...Cool

  • 20 months ago · Quote · #74

    Kinghal

    Everyone was expecting a Philodore.  I actually have twice got a Philodore in an OTB tournament.

  • 20 months ago · Quote · #75

    sayusan

    like

  • 20 months ago · Quote · #76

    MDCCP

    Cool :) !

  • 20 months ago · Quote · #77

    arjai101

    that was fun

  • 20 months ago · Quote · #78

    RaleighRaine

    Great puzzle!

  • 20 months ago · Quote · #79

    mpxl

    simple .. 

  • 20 months ago · Quote · #80

    indian_crown

    good


Back to Top

Post your reply: