Upgrade to Chess.com Premium!

12/13/2012 - Mate in 3


  • 5 months ago · Quote · #161

    PIRATCH

    Newba wrote:

    SHOULD BE 2... Ke6 and then it wouldn't be mate in 3.

    Yes, it is still mate in 3: 2...Ke6 3 Qd5#

  • 5 months ago · Quote · #162

    henny45

    Cool


Back to Top

Post your reply: