Upgrade to Chess.com Premium!

12/30/2010 - Going For It


  • 3 years ago · Quote · #101

    michaelhays

    [COMMENT DELETED]
  • 3 years ago · Quote · #102

    jim995

    Nice sacrifice to create a matin net and unstoppable mate.

  • 3 years ago · Quote · #103

    michaelhays

    [COMMENT DELETED]
  • 3 years ago · Quote · #104

    michaelhays

  • 3 years ago · Quote · #105

    kc2010

    [COMMENT DELETED]
  • 3 years ago · Quote · #106

    gaz-y

    f6 and then rxg7 would have been a far quicker mate. not sure why so many puzzles have such ambiguous answers

  • 3 years ago · Quote · #107

    mark3e

    Yes Rg8 - oh yeah Qh5++

  • 3 years ago · Quote · #108

    GWA-53

    The King can't escape anymore. That's really true.

  • 3 years ago · Quote · #109

    dwickwire

    Knight to G6 to block is much better than moving King over, prolongs & maybe even could defer a immanent checkmate.

  • 3 years ago · Quote · #110

    Chessthefacts

    hyaenodon88 wrote:

    I th.


  • 3 years ago · Quote · #111

    Chessthefacts

    I think this is a major error. There are at least two moves which get to mate faster.

    The 'slution' is the long way around.

  • 3 years ago · Quote · #112

    diontd

    good

  • 3 years ago · Quote · #113

    K-Lite

    i liked this one..

  • 3 years ago · Quote · #114

    Timothy_P

    If Black doesn't threaten g7, checkmate is assured by Qg7

  • 3 years ago · Quote · #115

    ChessChump99207

    nice

  • 3 years ago · Quote · #116

    ArgyleRS

    4. f6 Ng6 5. h5 Kg8 6. hxg6 Re8 7. g7. Black can't prevent Rh8

  • 3 years ago · Quote · #117

    chessplayer110

    easy, simple so forth so forth

  • 3 years ago · Quote · #118

    bobobobob101

    The_Viper wrote:

    but it's not a check mate as black can block the queen by Ng6


     exactly what i was thinking

  • 3 years ago · Quote · #119

    ofhs93

    Would Pf6 not make more sense for white's 2nd move????

  • 3 years ago · Quote · #120

    sjpdna

    nice


Back to Top

Post your reply: