11426 Players currently online!
Man vs. Machine - good luck!
Turn-based games at any time!
Vote for the best move to win!
Do you have what it takes?
Backgammon, Yatzy, and more!
Sharpen your tactical vision!
Get advice and game insights!
Learn from top players & pros!
View millions of master games!
Your virtual chess coach!
Perfect your opening moves!
Test your skills vs. computer!
Find the right private coach!
Can you solve it each day?
Bring it all together!
Beginners, start here!
Make friends & play team games!
News from the world of chess!
Search all Chess.com members!
Find local clubs & events!
Who's the best of your friends?
Read what members are saying!
Nice puzzle, got most of it on my first try.
moving the bishop next to the king is a bad move imo and the king could just take it.
I dont understand the 4th move. Why dosen't the king simply take out the bishop?
Edit: lol, stalemate!!!
Ugh I hate these draw puzzles. Not saying they're not useful, but so much calculation just for the sake of not losing.
This is the best puzzle I've done in a long time .
Um. Think I'm missing something., Why wouldnt the black king take bishop at B3?
It's hard but....after you try, you get it.
OK, it seems to me that on move 5 black could have advanced the E pawn instead of moving the king. There was no stalemate as long as the bishop could still move. I don't see how white could have prevented a pawn promotion after that.
Post #98 explains that & many other variations very well !
I don't see how it explains an ything. Black does not have to move the king since he is not in check. White is not in stalemate as long as he can move the bishop. The black e pawn can advance to promotion. Can anyone explain why not?
This puzzle is wrong. The first three moves for white are correct; but it should be 4. White f3 - black to e4 then the draw move 5. White e2 as one logical scenario. Unless someone else sees it different? Blacks king can easily nab the bishop in this puzzle then promote a pawn and win!
Thanks for the endgame lesson!
I don't seem to understand 4. Bb3, which obviously leads to 4. Kxb3, when 4. Bf3 is a visibly better option (4. f4 would just lead to 5. Bh5)
why not just sack the bishop for the draw?
wouldn't the black king of taken the bishop on move 4. 3b?
How do I start a thread?
by Ziryab a few minutes ago
by mhamdmhamd441 4 minutes ago
10/4/2015 - Forced Mate
by mshinde 5 minutes ago
Examples of Soviet cheating in FIDE competition: Petrosian-Korchnoi match, 1971
by beauti_kanta 7 minutes ago
Looking for relayers of live chess events
by mhamdmhamd441 7 minutes ago
السلام عليكم هام جدا
by mhamdmhamd441 10 minutes ago
RM vs BG 1st board
by iforkyou 11 minutes ago
Stuff Non-Chess Players Say
by akafett 13 minutes ago
by breaker90 16 minutes ago
Soviet Cheating in FIDE Competition: Keres-Botvinnik, 1948, Pt 3
by Marignon 18 minutes ago
Why Join | Chess Topics |
Help & Support |
© 2015 Chess.com
• Chess - English
We are working hard to make Chess.com available in over 70 languages. Check back over the year as we develop the technology to add more, and we will try our best to notify you when your language is ready for translating!