Upgrade to Chess.com Premium!

1/3/2014 - Staunton Gambit Analysis


  • 7 months ago · Quote · #201

    calljesus

    nice mate!Cool

  • 7 months ago · Quote · #202

    calljesus

    [COMMENT DELETED]
  • 7 months ago · Quote · #203

    Ocky

    Nice

  • 6 months ago · Quote · #204

    iMacChess

    Very good one...

  • 6 months ago · Quote · #205

    andre_fratelli

    Isn't this a better alternative? Mate in 4, instead of 5.
     
  • 6 months ago · Quote · #206

    BryanCFB

    andre_fratelli wrote:
    Isn't this a better alternative? Mate in 4, instead of 5.
     
     

    If I remember correctly, the correct defense is 3...Bf7.

  • 6 months ago · Quote · #207

    andre_fratelli

    What? How? I fail to see how that would be better =\

  • 6 months ago · Quote · #208

    BryanCFB

    andre_fratelli wrote:

    What? How? I fail to see how that would be better =\

    3... Bf7 4. b3+ Bxb3 5. cxb3+ Kxb3, no mate in four or five.

  • 6 months ago · Quote · #209

    andre_fratelli

    Oh, I get it. I was using the same defence. Foolish =) thx !

  • 4 months ago · Quote · #210

    Juncedan

    Got the first moves just right, but the pawn I did not understand until later. gotta learn...


Back to Top

Post your reply: