Upgrade to Chess.com Premium!

1/5/2012 - Edward Lasker - Sir George Thomas, London 1911


  • 18 months ago · Quote · #201

    icanhasacheeseburger

    easy easy easy easy

    easy easy easy easy

    easy easy easy easy

  • 18 months ago · Quote · #202

    slowhare

    Optimuschess89 wrote:
    slowhare wrote:

    Another way

     


    why should you move pawn to h6, if you can simply capture the horse with rook?


    Blocks Qh7 mate.

  • 18 months ago · Quote · #203

    nylimoman

    terrible, all the moves make no sense

  • 18 months ago · Quote · #204

    musicgirl123

    I got a couple easily, but then it was really hard!

  • 18 months ago · Quote · #205

    dufferps

    Once again, I couldn't see all the way to the end, but I could bet on Queen sacrifice being the correct first move.  Interesting that the subsequent moves afterwards were pretty straightforward.  I'll have to go back and check if I strongly considered other moves after the queen sac. 

    In a game, I'm pretty sure I would have started with a check by a knight

    EDIT - Okay - I see - 1. Nxf6+  gxf6 - and now the black queen is guarding that critical h7 pawn.  That line goes nowhere for white.

  • 18 months ago · Quote · #206

    glsmith

    Too many ways to checkmate!

  • 18 months ago · Quote · #207

    ghamilto61

    slowhare wrote:
    Optimuschess89 wrote:
    slowhare wrote:

    Another way

     


    why should you move pawn to h6, if you can simply capture the horse with rook?


    Blocks Qh7 mate.


     Did you look at 1. Ng5  g6?

  • 18 months ago · Quote · #208

    squirrel97

    Wouldn't Nxf6 be simpler? It wins a bishop and is one step closer to checkmate.

    Or Ng5 covers h7 3 times.

  • 18 months ago · Quote · #209

    chessica

    it was gone even without castling

  • 18 months ago · Quote · #210

    kyleevon

    love it, love lasker

  • 18 months ago · Quote · #211

    Churrasqueira

  • 18 months ago · Quote · #212

    In_sect

    AlivePoet wrote:

    Why didn't he play 6. Be4#? The castle seems unnecessary.


    6. Be4+ Bxe4

    There's a fianchettoed bishop in the corner. ;)

  • 18 months ago · Quote · #213

    emma1

    got it

  • 18 months ago · Quote · #214

    Gil-Gandel

    nylimoman wrote:

    terrible, all the moves make no sense


    [Translation mode = patzer]I don't understand this, it's too hard[/mode]

  • 18 months ago · Quote · #215

    amaurifm

    Lindo ...  mate de cavalo

  • 18 months ago · Quote · #216

    RenataCFC

    squirrel97 wrote:

    Wouldn't Nxf6 be simpler? It wins a bishop and is one step closer to checkmate.

    Or Ng5 covers h7 3 times.


    1. Nxf6 gxf6, at which point there is no mate and no gain of material.

    Or,

    1. Ng5 g6, likewise.

    Both suffer the fatal flaw of allowing the black queen to protect h7, and go nowhere.

  • 18 months ago · Quote · #217

    RenataCFC

    In_sect wrote:
    AlivePoet wrote:

    Why didn't he play 6. Be4#? The castle seems unnecessary.


    6. Be4+ Bxe4

    There's a fianchettoed bishop in the corner. ;)


    Evil nasty buggers, those are.

  • 18 months ago · Quote · #218

    Norge2

    last post. woo hoo. this was an amazing problem. probably my favorite

  • 18 months ago · Quote · #219

    legoplaychess

    uuuuqqiiii

  • 18 months ago · Quote · #220

    abusch38

    Darth_Craft wrote:

    The original game went on like this : (which I think is way better) 6. Be2 Kg2 7. Rh2 Kg1 8. Kd2(O-O-O)# One of the masterpieces of Lasker.


    Agreed. That's what I tried to do as well. I like forcing Black's moves.


Back to Top

Post your reply: