Upgrade to Chess.com Premium!

2/5/2012 - Mate in 2


  • 2 years ago · Quote · #21

    noslen1966

     easy one

  • 2 years ago · Quote · #22

    corpsporc

    .

  • 2 years ago · Quote · #23

    EduardoML10

    Difficult Sunday Frown

  • 2 years ago · Quote · #24

    pyramider

    Only two moves needed EE. a5+ followed by the discovered mate Bxc5#Enoch-Elijah wrote:

    It was mate in 3, I know, cause I did it in 3 moves, don't understand how they could have made that mistake in the title.


  • 2 years ago · Quote · #25

    drshark

    sweet

  • 2 years ago · Quote · #26

    dammimind

    simple simple

  • 2 years ago · Quote · #27

    deepak21071974

    hmm:)

  • 2 years ago · Quote · #28

    KumarAnkur

    i won't say its easy :)

  • 2 years ago · Quote · #29

    Labfrog

    Cool

  • 2 years ago · Quote · #30

    reffahc

    easy

  • 2 years ago · Quote · #31

    RSzgvYzxpizmp

    Enoch-Elijah wrote:

    It was mate in 3, I know, cause I did it in 3 moves, don't understand how they could have made that mistake in the title.


    It is two moves

  • 2 years ago · Quote · #32

    psyjonz

    this one wasnt 2 bad....

  • 2 years ago · Quote · #33

    Steve_AK

    second page first time

  • 2 years ago · Quote · #34

    pbazan

    Nice!

  • 2 years ago · Quote · #35

    ocmn6

    sunday... tough puzzle starts!

  • 2 years ago · Quote · #36

    Templetonkaka

    thaNKSWink

  • 2 years ago · Quote · #37

    dragana87

    nice

  • 2 years ago · Quote · #38

    Gm_andrewfeng

    EZ

  • 2 years ago · Quote · #39

    gndlgisdbna

    Not as easy as other mate in 2s. Good.

  • 2 years ago · Quote · #40

    Korkandai

    May be a good puzzle but I solved it in first chance. The title mate in two is correct.


Back to Top

Post your reply: