Upgrade to Chess.com Premium!

3/4/2014 - Revelation


  • 10 months ago · Quote · #41

    mastermind_3

    nice mate!!! Tongue OutCoolWink

  • 10 months ago · Quote · #42

    abekiroz

    nice one

  • 10 months ago · Quote · #43

    navin123456789

    ...

  • 10 months ago · Quote · #44

    humanistmind

    I had 3 moves. 1. RxR NxR  2. Ne8+ BxN 3. Qd8# The 2 move solution...obviously better.

  • 10 months ago · Quote · #45

    Albert_DC

    Simple yet elegant.

  • 10 months ago · Quote · #46

    Texesa

    nice

  • 10 months ago · Quote · #47

    dufferps

    It took me a while to see this stunninbg 2-move combo,

  • 10 months ago · Quote · #48

    GMPangestu

    obvious

  • 10 months ago · Quote · #49

    anmolthakur90

    again failed to solve...........Frown

  • 10 months ago · Quote · #50

    robertkeitz111

    cool!

  • 10 months ago · Quote · #51

    vikhramviki

    yes

  • 10 months ago · Quote · #52

    glsmith

    Cool

  • 10 months ago · Quote · #53

    dufferps

    humanistmind wrote:

    I had 3 moves. 1. RxR NxR  2. Ne8+ BxN 3. Qd8# The 2 move solution...obviously better.

    Interesting thought process here.  Once you see this mate-in-3,  the mate in 2 solution (which uses much the same mating situation - Queen, protected by the d1 Rook, mates on an adjacent-diagonal square) becomes all the more obvious,  But once we see a sure-fire forced mating combo, it is hard to shift and look for something better.  Only if we are told there is a "mate-in-2" solution do we look any burther,

  • 10 months ago · Quote · #54

    jiangyh

    1

  • 10 months ago · Quote · #55

    jiangyh

    1

  • 10 months ago · Quote · #56

    jiangyh

    1

  • 10 months ago · Quote · #57

    jiangyh

    1

  • 10 months ago · Quote · #58

    SukantK3p4

    eazy

  • 10 months ago · Quote · #59

    jiangyh

    1

  • 10 months ago · Quote · #60

    jiangyh

    1


Back to Top

Post your reply: