10896 Players currently online!
Man vs. Machine - good luck!
Turn-based games at any time!
Vote for the best move to win!
Do you have what it takes?
Sharpen your tactical vision!
Get advice and game insights!
Learn from top players & pros!
View millions of master games!
Your virtual chess coach!
Perfect your opening moves!
Test your skills vs. computer!
Find the right private coach!
Can you solve it each day?
Bring it all together!
Beginners, start here!
Make friends & play team games!
News from the world of chess!
Search all Chess.com members!
Find local clubs & events!
Who's the best of your friends?
Read what members are saying!
very easy one...
Rather obvious. Sometimes real games have positions more interesting than elaborate puzzles. Not sure many players would sacrifice the queen very easily in real life but it happens often enough. The trouble is in a game with time limitations, if you miss-calculate the sacrifice looks so silly it is embarassing.
Now to the important stuff: THird page, probably fourth.
9 repeated nine times
Funny faces in few separate posting
..So much for chess players, even the wannabees, being a smart bunch. We are as stupid as anybody else and even worse
nice and easy
WOW COOL !!!
With the title, this was easy for a Thursday puzzle. Of course, black could have chosen to move his king instead of being suckered into capturing white's queen and abandoning control of the eighth rank, but it would not have saved him.
1. ... Kb8, 2, Qxe8#1. ... Kd8, 2. Qd7#
Interestingly, the first time I looked at 1. Qd6+ Rxd6, it was with the idea of some kind of 2. Nxd6 - hoping for a fork, (enabling a knight fork of Queen and King or another vital piece is a common sucker punch in chess), but I immediately saw that would be no fork and would open escape squares for the king. Then I saw that black was in no position to effectively defend the 8th rank, once the rook came down.
EDIT: I think a true "sucker punch" would be if offer of queen sacrfice were not forced, but just seemed too good to pass up. In this case, black was not "suckered" into capturing the queen, he was virtually "forced" to do so.
The ole' famous Queen Sacrifice!
I can't believe two players would actually play a line like this. Were there some kind of rules against capturing the queen and/or against initial moves 2 squares by a pawn? Was the competition to see who could make the worst blunders? (my attempts to show the line presented by skba_07 don't work)
step by step, inch by inch
Title gave it totally away.
Qxc6 works too, only move for black is Qxd4+ followed by being wiped out.
So you're telling me that Qxc6 works too for mate-in-4. Really?
Please, so tell me what's your followup to get mate that quickly after the black queen takes the knight? Just get the rook off that bank rank and be done with it. How does this move work as well?
1/26/2015 - Richard Teichmann vs. NN, Berlin, 1914
by pbazan 4 minutes ago
Please give me some advise on how to analyse your games .
by Laurenchessdiva 6 minutes ago
Sacrificing knight for 2 pawns
by goobenhymer 8 minutes ago
Setting Chesstempo for Ideal Study
by SilentKnighte5 13 minutes ago
Geraralism in chess, from general chess players.
by LazyChessPlayer3201 14 minutes ago
am i a prodigy?
by Mottley 19 minutes ago
Why does Chess.com use a fake testimonial???
by SocialPanda 21 minutes ago
"pick a side" button for team matches
by SatBchMagicer 24 minutes ago
Chess 960 Live chess?
by sergey960 26 minutes ago
by QXF7_PATZER 34 minutes ago
Why Join | Chess Topics |
Help & Support |
© 2015 Chess.com
• Chess - English
We are working hard to make Chess.com available in over 70 languages. Check back over the year as we develop the technology to add more, and we will try our best to notify you when your language is ready for translating!