8858 Players currently online!
Man vs. Machine - good luck!
Turn-based games at any time!
Vote for the best move to win!
Do you have what it takes?
Sharpen your tactical vision!
Get advice and game insights!
Learn from top players & pros!
View millions of master games!
Your virtual chess coach!
Perfect your opening moves!
Test your skills vs. computer!
Find the right private coach!
Can you solve it each day?
Bring it all together!
Beginners, start here!
Make friends & play team games!
News from the world of chess!
Search all Chess.com members!
Find local clubs & events!
Who's the best of your friends?
Read what members are saying!
tragictravisty
very nice puzzle.
Djazbin
The black rook is sucked off the 8 rank and the white rook punch the king on a back rank mate... who said chess is not a violent game?!
Daniel-Young
Rook g8 works as well.
FullFledgedFighter
ROFLMAO
IKR LAWLAWLWLAWLALALAWROFLMEOW.
Christopher_D
pretty easy but a nice practice
KittyAX
nice and easy
GMchessmaster
ratedcharisma
love ur title
zanati
tanmay_chakrabarti
good one indeed.
mason286
har har har
sandmanlk
Qe6+ winning
stephen_33
Quite good puzzle made better by an interesting thread. I had trouble finding the first move for a little while & considered Qxc6 but then saw the threat from d4 & realised it was no good: So why some people propose it as a valid alternative is beyond me - the given solution is a forced mate in 4. I don't see how you can improve on that unless you can find one in 3 !
'slowhare', I think you found yourself having the wrong argument & with the wrong opponent on this one - 'ndskykng' always defends his corner well & that's no bad thing.
And by the way, I think that in your longer solution (post #151) you may have missed a quicker mate at move 16: Try Rxa7#.
carlosmadura
good
Dramaticpiece
easy. but i never thought about back rank like that before!
chessica
controvercial!
ndskykng
Appreciate that Stephen. That's all I was trying to get across to slow... that his alternative wasn't a move that works also, not like a mate-in-4. It never should have escalated like that.
Good eye on move 16. I never calculated that far cause I saw the pressure building on that back rank by queen+rook, I knew I was losing a rook anyway and felt I shouldn't waste an escape move and should take a pawn down with me. But yeah, if it got there, then 16. Rxa7# (or 16. Qxa7#) would have worked. Nice catch.
mathteacher
Another queen sac for da chess daddy mac. :)
wyh2013
it was okay
vinupradeep2580
Lose to Win . A prefect game!!!!
Solve this Riddle if you can
by ivandh a few minutes ago
5/20/2013 - Mate in 3
by senormouse2001 a few minutes ago
Premium subscription trials/giveaways?
by WeekendWarrior11 6 minutes ago
Making a plan and sticking with it
by tntain 7 minutes ago
Bad Members!
by VLMJ 11 minutes ago
gg
by blasterdragon 11 minutes ago
5,000 Signs You Don't Know Enough About Chess
by BEOGRADSKI_SINDIKAT 15 minutes ago
why do people stall when they are losing?
by piotozz 15 minutes ago
Post/Annotate a puzzle u think is the best sac. for a Mate, NOW!!!(why is it?)
by ViktorHNielsen 15 minutes ago
chess.tv not archiving videos
by romanic666 18 minutes ago