11585 Players currently online!
Man vs. Machine - good luck!
Turn-based games at any time!
Vote for the best move to win!
Do you have what it takes?
Sharpen your tactical vision!
Get advice and game insights!
Learn from top players & pros!
View millions of master games!
Your virtual chess coach!
Perfect your opening moves!
Test your skills vs. computer!
Find the right private coach!
Can you solve it each day?
Bring it all together!
Beginners, start here!
Make friends & play team games!
News from the world of chess!
Search all Chess.com members!
Find local clubs & events!
Who's the best of your friends?
Read what members are saying!
No, I'm not joking! "Man" simply does not equal "pieces"!
Source: John Nunn: Rook endings, Batsford 1999.At the moment I cannot quote from it because I'm reorganizing my chess books and it's in a box with other boxes over this box. Too much work to reach it!
I tablebase lingo, X-man, X-men, or X-piece, implies the total number left on the board, including the kings and pawns (if any pawns are left). The description might be a bit of misnomer, I agree, but that's what people call it.
First I thought they changed it. But I found even in Ken Thompson (who first programed TPE) wrote about 5-Man-ending.
Maybe it's really too confusing for people to leave out kings for counting the remaining material for endings ... (I really read about it and I still think it was in one of Nunn's endings books ... Nunn there also has his own convention - ! for only move for a win ...)
Yep, It probably came about due to the description of a tablebase position, for example, KRPKR, so it makes some sense for those who make tablebase algorithms to count up all the "letters" in that as 5-"man".
How is this a draw? Black clearly wins with 2 passed pawns
two passed rook pawns its a draw the king goes to the corner blacks bishop can't control then he sacks his bishop for the h pawn the resulting endgame is a theoretical draw
settle for a draw ? BS White can win !!!
Show me your lines...
You may want to read the rest of the thread. I put it into an endgame tablebase generator and let it run for a day and it determined it to be a forced win.
i guess it won for black the puzzle gave the wrong move for black though and black can avoid avoid the theoretical draw with kc7 rather than grabbing the pawn
waste of pieces
4/26/2015 - Mate in 2
by aki907 a few minutes ago
by PowerfulGod a few minutes ago
DOES THE FOOD WE EAT EFFECTS THE RATE OF WINNIG IN CHESS?
by cricketfan79 4 minutes ago
#2 is Anand now!
by ol_my 6 minutes ago
by power_2_the_people 7 minutes ago
Moving a Pawn Twice in the Opening
by Optimissed 12 minutes ago
eliminating blunders without the wait?
by ThisisChesstiny 17 minutes ago
Seeking wise and somewhat knowledgeable friend(s)
by chester6 21 minutes ago
Facebook group disliking a chess site
by ViennaGame 25 minutes ago
What's On Your Bookshelf?
by Moriarty_697 26 minutes ago
Why Join | Chess Topics |
Help & Support |
© 2015 Chess.com
• Chess - English
We are working hard to make Chess.com available in over 70 languages. Check back over the year as we develop the technology to add more, and we will try our best to notify you when your language is ready for translating!