15160 Players currently online!
Man vs. Machine - good luck!
Turn-based games at any time!
Vote for the best move to win!
Do you have what it takes?
Sharpen your tactical vision!
Get advice and game insights!
Learn from top players & pros!
View millions of master games!
Your virtual chess coach!
Perfect your opening moves!
Test your skills vs. computer!
Find the right private coach!
Can you solve it each day?
Bring it all together!
Beginners, start here!
Make friends & play team games!
News from the world of chess!
Search all Chess.com members!
Find local clubs & events!
Who's the best of your friends?
Read what members are saying!
Queen sac ... again! haha j/k it's all good, but perhaps more varied next time?
Jonmdill take a chill pill, and relax. If you want to hear something worthwile, challenge me. When your telling all of us "Never say first again. Why would you say first. Stop it." I gotta figure something else is bugging you. Have a nice day
I'm getting good at this!
First try I got it
wow!!! that was the last thing I would have done.
Never say first again. Why would you say first. Stop it.
Oh, and I also don't care if you found it easy. So did 50% of the commentors. Let's try saying something worthwile once in a while.
*Bursting your bubble* Your comment was not very worthwhile either.
Oh what a knight!
Box em in and give em no where to go! I like it.
The mate in two gave it away. Got it in 10 seconds and usually I'm not good at these, so I wouldn't label it as challenging. Perhaps if Chess.com got rid of the titles...
I don't see why people are saying Rxd5. Rxd5 while winning material, does not achieve mate in two since black can either check them or defend the c7 square.
Again, maybe if they got rid of the title, it wouldn't have been as obvious. Or maybe it would be. I wouldn't know since I'm only an 1100 player.
easy peasy lemon squisy
since you dont like it when i say 1st....... Simple
After reading this i still dont see what your comment had to do with the puzzle, your just as much a part of the problem then; anyway, i liked this one. Putting challenging in the title threw me off a moment and made me feel the need to double check the simple solution i came up with. All in all i dint find it challenging but a good queens sacrifice is sometimes difficult to spot and even harder not to fall into if your the one being fooled.
What's On Your Bookshelf?
by benisbest 5 minutes ago
Multiple Legal Moves of Same Piece under Blitz Rules
by whymichael 7 minutes ago
Sporadic USCF Title System
by dpnorman 9 minutes ago
Chess openings that suit tactical players fancy?
by I_Am_Second 10 minutes ago
What would be the rating of a top chess player in the late 1800s today
by yureesystem 10 minutes ago
If you could change one rule of chess,what would it be?
by Dodger111 11 minutes ago
by Scottrf 14 minutes ago
3/1/2015 - Compelled To Lose
by 1945juangutierrez 14 minutes ago
by BigKingBud 14 minutes ago
Killed and don't know why.
by Till_98 18 minutes ago
Why Join | Chess Topics |
Help & Support |
© 2015 Chess.com
• Chess - English
We are working hard to make Chess.com available in over 70 languages. Check back over the year as we develop the technology to add more, and we will try our best to notify you when your language is ready for translating!