10234 Players currently online!
Man vs. Machine - good luck!
Turn-based games at any time!
Vote for the best move to win!
Do you have what it takes?
Sharpen your tactical vision!
Get advice and game insights!
Learn from top players & pros!
View millions of master games!
Your virtual chess coach!
Perfect your opening moves!
Test your skills vs. computer!
Find the right private coach!
Can you solve it each day?
Bring it all together!
Beginners, start here!
Make friends & play team games!
News from the world of chess!
Search all Chess.com members!
Find local clubs & events!
Who's the best of your friends?
Read what members are saying!
Queen sac ... again! haha j/k it's all good, but perhaps more varied next time?
Jonmdill take a chill pill, and relax. If you want to hear something worthwile, challenge me. When your telling all of us "Never say first again. Why would you say first. Stop it." I gotta figure something else is bugging you. Have a nice day
I'm getting good at this!
First try I got it
wow!!! that was the last thing I would have done.
Never say first again. Why would you say first. Stop it.
Oh, and I also don't care if you found it easy. So did 50% of the commentors. Let's try saying something worthwile once in a while.
*Bursting your bubble* Your comment was not very worthwhile either.
Oh what a knight!
Box em in and give em no where to go! I like it.
The mate in two gave it away. Got it in 10 seconds and usually I'm not good at these, so I wouldn't label it as challenging. Perhaps if Chess.com got rid of the titles...
I don't see why people are saying Rxd5. Rxd5 while winning material, does not achieve mate in two since black can either check them or defend the c7 square.
Again, maybe if they got rid of the title, it wouldn't have been as obvious. Or maybe it would be. I wouldn't know since I'm only an 1100 player.
easy peasy lemon squisy
since you dont like it when i say 1st....... Simple
After reading this i still dont see what your comment had to do with the puzzle, your just as much a part of the problem then; anyway, i liked this one. Putting challenging in the title threw me off a moment and made me feel the need to double check the simple solution i came up with. All in all i dint find it challenging but a good queens sacrifice is sometimes difficult to spot and even harder not to fall into if your the one being fooled.
10/2/2014 - Judit Polgar - Artashes Minasian, Batumi, 1999
by trurojoe 2 minutes ago
Latvian gambit rescue ?
by uh-ohh 27 minutes ago
Kasparov on Stupidity
by lebid 34 minutes ago
Is the Fried Liver Attack good for white?
by therearenonamesleft 47 minutes ago
Windows Phone 8 Beta Testers Needed
by sergrnz 50 minutes ago
by ghostofmaroczy 90 minutes ago
Ashley's Million-dollar chess tourney - but bring your own clocks
by edmundich 90 minutes ago
[COMPLiMENTS]: Blocking players after they leave 1 nice note on your wall?
by RonaldJosephCote 92 minutes ago
9/1/2014 - Mate in 2
by sato_au 105 minutes ago
Studying the Semi-Slav
by ghostofmaroczy 108 minutes ago
Why Join | Chess Topics |
Help & Support |
© 2014 Chess.com
• Chess - English
We are working hard to make Chess.com available in over 70 languages. Check back over the year as we develop the technology to add more, and we will try our best to notify you when your language is ready for translating!